It's hard to imagine how much of an impact Trump has made worldwide. One of the things that amazed me the most was people in foreign countries waving trump flags before the election. I don't remember people in other countries caring that much about who the U.S. President is. Maybe there was more to it than that.

The New York Times and ABC are aghast. An artisan in Red China has depicted President Emeritus Donald John Trump not as an orange crybaby, but as a contemplative spiritual leader in his 70s who Made America Great Again.

One thing is for sure. The fact that there's anyone out there who still holds Trump in high esteem --drives his political enemies crazy.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

I have seen a lot of conflicting data when it comes to the COVID-19 mRNA "vaccines." The case to give these untested drugs to children is simply absurd!

This MSN article presents many more questions than answers. "Drugmakers Push Vaccines for Kids Amid Debate Over Need for Shot"

Historically, pediatric vaccines have focused on killer childhood diseases, but the pandemic has thrown a curve into that thinking. While the virus has been a deadly force among older adults, it’s been shown to be mild in the young with deaths relatively minimal.

That’s sparked an emerging debate among scientists about how critical it is that children be immunized. Some say the case for inoculating kids is less pressing, given that their outcomes tend to be so much better. Worldwide, the rollout of vaccines has prioritized older people and others at risk because of their health or occupation.

“Vaccines for polio, diphtheria and meningitis were all geared to eliminate the most dangerous diseases in children,” said Michael Hefferon, an assistant professor in the pediatrics department at Queen’s University in Ontario. “We now have almost the opposite. It’s a disease of adults, and the older you get the more sinister it is. Therefore children are less relevant.”

Why are scientists moving to treat patients who are at the minimal risk? This is a DNA altering drug, not sunscreen!

The American Academy of Pediatrics agrees. In a Feb. 25 letter to the White House and top U.S. health officials, the group’s president, Lee Savio Beers, wrote that having a Covid-19 vaccine for children “is essential for our nation to end the pandemic.”

Children “have suffered throughout the pandemic in ways both seen and unseen,” she wrote. “We cannot allow children to be an afterthought when they have shared so much burden throughout this pandemic.”

Follow the science right? Giving children experimental drugs because you don't want them to feel left out -- is not science. In fact it's the opposite of science. It's administering drugs based on an emotional response.

The science says that children are at minimal risk, and should not be vaccinated, much less exposing them to something that will offer little to no benefit, but does have the possibility of adverse, even deadly, reactions.

The entire response to the COVID-19 has been strange. It seems that the pharmaceutical companies were in a race to get a vaccine, before we really knew why the high risk patients -- were even high risk. Normally studies would be centered on making sure that patients reacting poorly to exposure have treatments available. Vaccines ignore those who are already sick. Vaccines are a preventative drug, not a treatment. This whole process has been backwards.

Today I saw this article. CDC shortens Covid social distancing guidelines for kids in school to 3 feet with masks

The CDC said it continues to recommend at least six feet distance between adults in schools and between adults and students. It also still recommends six feet social distancing in common areas, when eating, during in-door activities, such as band practice and sports, and in settings outside of the classroom.

“CDC is committed to leading with science and updating our guidance as new evidence emerges,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a statement. “Safe in-person instruction gives our kids access to critical social and mental health services that prepare them for the future, in addition to the education they need to succeed.”

Science is about consistence. If six feet is still needed between adults and children, why would it be any different between two children? None of this makes any sense. None of this is based on science.

In the next few paragraphs you see the real reason why 3 feet is now allowed, and it's not based on science.

“What the CDC wants to do is they want to accumulate data and when the data shows that there is an ability to be 3 feet they will act accordingly,” Fauci told CNN. “I can assure you within a reasonable amount of time, quite reasonable, they will be giving guidelines according to the data they have.”

President Joe Biden has made safely reopening the nation’s schools for in-person learning a focus of his first 100 days in office. Some parents have been forced to stay at home to watch their children instead of going to work.

The administration has said it is pouring $10 billion from the recently passed stimulus package into Covid-19 testing for schools in an effort to hasten the return to in-person learning across the country. The money will be used in part to provide diagnostic tests to symptomatic teachers, staff and students, as well as those who don’t have symptoms but might have been exposed to an infectious person.

So it's six feet, wear a mask, wash your hands... Unless we have to get kids back to school within the remaining 42 days of Biden's first 100 days in office. The end of Biden's first 100 days lands on April 30, 2021.

Furthermore, if it's OK for kids to be (3) feet apart, then why push the vaccine, for those least effected?

Follow the science, right?

03-22-21 ***************** UPDATE BELOW *****************

Former FDA Chief Says Social Distancing Mandate "Wasn’t Based on Clear Science."

Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said that the six-foot social distancing mandate that was employed across much of the United States and the world to deal with the CCP virus pandemic “wasn’t based on clear science.”

“This six-foot distancing requirement has probably been the single costliest mitigation tactic that we’ve employed in response to COVID … and it really wasn’t based on clear science. … We should have re-adjudicated this much earlier,” he said in an interview with CNBC.

What do you think?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Now that the number of people killed in the whole nursing home tragedy in New York is beginning to come out, it's time to protect the Democrat Party.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s top aide is admitting to a coverup in New York state’s Covid-19 nursing home death toll, according to multiple reports.

CNN and The New York Post report Melissa DeRosa, Secretary to the New York governor, privately apologized to Democratic lawmakers during a virtual call on Wednesday. DeRosa said “we froze” data on Covid-19 deaths among long-term care facility residents out of fear the true numbers would “be used against us” by President Donald Trump and federal prosecutors, according to sources who participated in the call.

Cuomo is a large liability, and his mandates were echoed by some other states' governors. This is shedding a bad light on the Democrat Party's handling of the COVID-19 issues in their states. What's the party's answer? Get Cuomo as far away as you can Democrat Party as possible before he's brought up on charges for his handling of the nursing home deaths, and the coverup of the data.

Democrats never do anything without the blessing of the party --the fraudulent death statistics tie directly back to the Democrat Party. But they want it to appear as if Cuomo was acting alone. I don't buy that for a minute. That's why they had a leaked virtual call in which Melissa DeRosa was "apologizing" to Democratic lawmakers. This was leaked on purpose to further distance Cuomo from the Democrat Party.

Now Cuomo is going to have an entire Congo Line of accusers going after him for sexual harassment. Harassment charges never really hurt Democrat candidates, because the media refuses to cover them. If they are covering the accusers of Cuomo, it has nothing to do with harassment. It's a method of taking him out of the lime light for the nursing home deaths, while simultaneously distancing him from the Democrat Party as a whole.

The stories and accusers just keep coming out of the woodwork.

A former aide says Gov. Andrew Cuomo was “trying to sleep with me” during a one-on-one meeting in his Albany office last year — with the 25-year-old adding that “he implied to me that I was old enough for him and he was lonely.”

Charlotte Bennett made the stunning comments in an interview that aired Thursday night on the “CBS Evening News with Norah O’Donnell,” saying that her then-boss, Cuomo, now 63, asked probing questions about her sex life when they were alone together on June 5.

Far left leaning CBS News is all of a sudden interested in something that Cuomo is accused of? Since when?

But the hits just keep on coming.

Two more women came forward Saturday to accuse Gov. Cuomo of sexually harassing behavior, including a former press aide who describes struggling to free herself from his repeated hugs, and a young assistant who now says he left her feeling like “just a skirt.”

Former press aide Karen Hinton endured a “very long, too long, too tight, too intimate” embrace from Cuomo in a dimly lit Los Angeles hotel room in December 2000, she told the Washington Post.

Again another leftist media organization is now worried about what Cuomo is being accused of?

This is all about misdirection, that's all this is. Look over here, there's a sex scandal!

The Democrat's plan to avoid scrutiny by the Trump Campaign, while making insanely stupid decisions, is being exposed. Sending the sick people back to the nursing homes to die is unforgivable. This should not be forgotten.

"Follow the science," they say. You don't need a study to know that sending sick people back to infect other people is a bad idea. That's the whole purpose of a quarantine in the first place!

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

I know that there's been some creepy stuff in the past, but this is getting pretty creepy!

The following is from an article on the Global Times.

Tired and depressed after a long day's work, a man sits down and asks his smart stereo to play a song. The stereo immediately recognizes his emotional state and plays him a cheerful tune. In the beautiful melody, the man is slowly rejuvenated, and his mood gradually improves.

Conversely, at a busy highway checkpoint, artificial intelligence (AI) pre-warning systems silently observe drivers and passengers in vehicles passing through. Seconds later, security officers stop a car with passengers looking strangely nervous and discover drugs in the car.

These scenes reminiscent of science fiction are on the increase in quotidian life. In China, emotion recognition technology is fast developing in this data and AI era boom, and has been widely used in various fields including health, anti-terrorism, and urban security, industry insiders told the Global Times.

"Currently, the AI emotion recognition tech is still led by the US, but its practical uses are already blossoming in China," said Wei Qingchen, head of EmoKit Tech Co., Ltd. that specializes in developing products based on its emotion recognition engine Emokit.

Most people have at least heard about the movie "Minority Report." As part of the "PreCrime" unit, the authorities arrest people for "Future Crimes" or crimes they have not yet committed. Of course this is science fiction, but check out this next part.

At least Tesla has the answer. Let the car do the driving for you, then you don't have to worry about appearing nervous. Also you could wear sunglasses at night. The AI won't know what to do.

Ma noted the important role this tech can play in maintaining social stability and protecting people's lives.

He referred to a shooting case that happened in the American city of Lakewood in 2009. In this case, ex-prisoner Maurice Clemmons fatally shot four police officers at a local coffee shop only one week after he was released from jail.

"It might not have happened if the jail had done a risk assessment on Clemmons, and postponed to release him after finding that he might have posed a threat to others' safety," Ma sighed.

So, they could have used the AI to determine that the guy was up to something. How would they know what he was up to? Or would they just use the AI to keep him in jail indefinitely? This is a very slippery slope.

Also disturbing is the fact that the best emotion reading AI is developed here in the US, which means they'll be deploying it shortly, if they haven't already used it to track down the people from January 6th who entered The Capitol. Hmm... I'm sure none of them were nervous!

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

I'm not very familiar with the World Economic Forum (WEF for all the cool kids) but I do find their take on the world economy a little strange. I would imagine that they support thriving economies around the globe, right?

If you look here, you'll see one of their videos that was put out earlier this week, it has since been removed.

NEW - Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum (WEF) tweeted yesterday that "Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world," accompanied by a video showing deserted streets, empty factories, and grounded planes. After backlash, they deleted it. Copy:pic.twitter.com/KWOF1OHkPH

— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) February 27, 2021

Why would the WEF be touting numbers based on a loss in world/global economic activity? Wouldn't the WEF be in support of ending the lockdowns, because it's good for the world/global economy?

The video is pointing out all of the good things that have come about as a result of global economic downturn. Who exactly is benefitting from this? Why do we need more of this? Why would the WEF be a proponent of this?

This is more than a little odd to me.

What do you think?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.