I don't remember hearing about anyone between the ages of 16 and 24 having heart issues, unless they were on drugs of some sort. If someone this young were to have a heart issue, drugs would be the very first thing they would be looking for, when it comes to those who have been vaccinated, they immediately write it off as a coincidence. Does that sound objective to you?

Epoch times covered the fact that the CDC is holding an emergency meeting to address the increased rates of heart illnesses following a second dose of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

The first portion of the meeting will feature an update on COVID-19 vaccine safety, including myocarditis cases seen after the administration of vaccines built on messenger RNA technology, according to the meeting agenda.

The CDC has so far identified 226 reports in people ages 30 and younger that might meet the agency’s “working case definition” of heart inflammation following the shots, Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a deputy director at the agency, told the Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory group during a virtual meeting. That was out of about 12.2 million who had received a vaccine as of May 31.

While the vast majority of the patients have recovered, 41 had ongoing symptoms, 15 are still hospitalized, and three are in intensive care units.

Shimabukuro told members that the CDC will continue to evaluate myocarditis following vaccination and assess the benefits and risks of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which both use mRNA technology, ahead of the emergency meeting next week.

“I think the myocarditis is something that needs to be looked at closely because we’re likely seeing the tip of the iceberg,” added Dr. Michael Kurilla, director of the Division of Clinical Innovation at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, which is part of the National Institutes of Health.

Pfizer said it supports the CDC’s assessment of the heart inflammation cases, noting that “the number of reports is small given the number of doses administered.”

“It is important to understand that a careful assessment of the reports is ongoing and it has not been concluded that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines cause myocarditis or pericarditis,” the company told The Epoch Times in an email.

While the general public is told that this is a rare occurrence. It's so damn rare that, "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory committee plans to hold an emergency meeting this month [June, 2021] to discuss the higher than expected reports of heart inflammation in young males following a second dose of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines."

Many now believe that the SARS-Cov-2 virus itself was not what caused the majority of severe reactions in people who were infected by the virus. It appears that there's more of an issue with the "spike protein" that the virus uses to attach itself to human cells. The following is just one example.

“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario, in an interview with Alex Pierson last Thursday, in which he warned listeners that his message was “scary.”

“We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin,” Bridle said on the show, which is not easily found in a Google search but went viral on the internet this weekend.

Bridle, a vaccine researcher who was awarded a $230,000 government grant last year for research on COVID vaccine development, said that he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to what’s called the “biodistribution study.”

“It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” said Bridle. “Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting.”

It will be a VERY long time before we can get to the truth on this, because nobody likes being wrong. Just keep in mind that all of these vaccines were released under Emergency Use Authorization, meaning that nobody can sue the manufacturers.

Keep that in mind next time you're asked to take part in any medical procedure.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

While Republicans are happy because the audits in Arizona and Georgia are producing hard proof of widespread fraud, the Leftists are not worried in the least. Why? Because they already have this all planned out.

President* Joe Biden has tapped Vice President Kamala Harris to lead the administration’s push for voting rights legislation, he said in a speech Tuesday in Tulsa, Okla.

In a statement following the speech, Harris said she would work with Congress, community and voting rights organizations, and the "private sector" to push voting rights efforts both nationally and in statehouses.

"The work ahead of us is to make voting accessible to all American voters, and to make sure every vote is counted through a free, fair, and transparent process," Harris said in the statement. "This is the work of democracy."

“I hear all of the folks on TV saying why doesn't Biden get this done? Well because Biden only has the majority of effectively four votes in the House and a tie in the Senate. With two members of the Senate who vote more with my Republican friends,” Biden said in a thinly-veiled swipe at Manchin and fellow moderate, Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.).

Neither Manchin nor Sinema’s office immediately returned a request for comment.

Democrats have renewed calls to get rid of the filibuster after Republicans last week blocked an independent, bipartisan commission to look into the January 6 riots at the Capitol.

All roads lead to voting law changes on the federal level.

I’ve been saying this from DAY ONE! It’s not as if the Republican legislators in the stolen states didn’t know about the lawsuits and voting law changes brought forth by Democrats –in their own states!

That’s why the audits won’t really matter. The Republican state legislators are just window dressing. Once the leftists pass (H.R. 1 / S.1) it won’t matter. The "For the People Act of 2021" is the left’s cover.

When fraud is found, which it will be, Democrats will say, “All the stuff Republicans are worried about from 2020 IS legal (now)! Why worry about it? It's over. If we held the election today, Biden would win!” That’s exactly where I think they are going with this.

I think I’ve seen one article, maybe two about H.R. 1 and S.1 being peddled by Schumer. They WILL get the "For the People Act of 2021" passed using the nuclear option. And now we are hearing more calls from the left to use the nuclear option. There is no meaningful Republican opposition to the "For the People Act of 2021" either, we know this because of the state legislators. They could have stopped all this before the 2020 election, and they didn't.

It's dangerous to see inaction and assume it's incompetence, the two are very different things. What people need to wake up to is the fact that the American people are being played from both sides. In fact we have been for a very long time. Much longer than I was aware. It's in any politician's interest to allow changes that result in their power being maintained. These are largely NOT people of virtue. Had they been people of virtue, we wouldn't be where we are today.

Democrats, leftists, AND REPUBLICANS have this all planned out, otherwise they wouldn’t have allowed the steal to go through in the sloppy way they did.

The Uni-Party WILL have their day in the sun.

The only question is, for how long?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

Try to get this out to as many people as you can. People need to see this to see the parallels to what we're dealing with right now with the COVID-19 "vaccines."

I don't know how much longer this will be on YouTube. They'll probably take it down once it gets enough views.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

There's a lot to cover here, and I want to get it in with as few words as possible.

Most of the people who are speaking out about vaccine passports are doing so on the basis that your health information is private. They quote the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or HIPAA. Your health information is NOT private. In fact it can be released for the following reasons:

As you can see the list is extensive. HIPAA was really designed to keep individuals from getting ahold of your medical records. What most people don't know is that HIPAA greatly increased access to your medical records for a number of reasons and for a number of institutions. Like anything else in the political world, those institutions and their designations can change over time. HIPAA was like any other law passed in Congress, it's intended purpose was the opposite of what its name suggests.

How many reasons can the government, or an agency (add company) get ahold of your medical history? Before relaxing the rules? See above, think of how many of those reasons could be used in a "pandemic." Now you understand why HIPAA will work against you when it comes to vaccine passports, not for you.

This brings me to my next point. HIPAA laws have recently been relaxed, giving the government and its designated authorities greater access to medical records in general.

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the need for an informed and coordinated public health response, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Alex Azar has declared a limited waiver of the following provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Beginning March 15, 2020, these provisions have been waived:

• Requirements to obtain a patient's agreement to speak with family members or friends involved in the patient’s care
• Requirement to honor a request to opt out of the facility directory
• Requirement to distribute a notice of privacy practices
• Patient's right to request privacy restrictions
• Patient's right to request confidential communications

This limited waiver is designed to facilitate the disclosure of patients’ protected health information in a number of specific circumstances connected to the ongoing pandemic

This waiver issued by Secretary Azar only applies under limited circumstances and is applicable:

• In the emergency area identified in the public health emergency declaration
• To hospitals that have instituted a disaster protocol
• For up to 72 hours from the time the hospital implements its disaster protocol. If the public health emergency declaration is terminated by the President or the Secretary before the end of this 72-hour period, then the hospital must return to compliance with the provisions of the Privacy Rule.

The whole country is the "emergency area identified in the public health emergency declaration!"

Coronavirus Disease 2019

When a national emergency was declared on March 13, 2020, we took action nationwide to aggressively respond to COVID-19.

You can read the blanket waivers for COVID-19 in the List of Blanket Waivers (PDF) UPDATED (4/9/2021).

The Public Health Service Act was used to declare a public health emergency (PHE) in the entire United States on January 31, 2020 giving us the flexibility to support our beneficiaries, effective January 27, 2020. The PHE was renewed on April 21, 2020, July 23, 2020, October 2, 2020, January 7, 2021, and April 15, 2021, effective April 21, 2021.

If you thought HIPAA was going to stop them from issuing vaccine passports, you were dead wrong.

How do we stop this from happening? I'm not sure. What I do know is that they desperately wish to implement a Corporate Social Credit System like in China.

The term “Corporate Social Credit System” is a somewhat of a misnomer, and the use of the word “system” is misleading, as it implies that the CSCS is a single, holistic, techno-regulatory apparatus, and that each policy under the social credit banner is a node in an integrated regulatory framework. In fact, while the data aggregation is centralized, the policy environment surrounding the CSCS is a disjointed mix of national and sector-specific policies, municipal pilot projects, and hybrid public-private sector cooperative agreements, loosely centered around the goal of enhancing market “trustworthiness.”

The CSCS has been chronically misunderstood outside of China. The system’s broad scope and technical and legal complexity, coupled with a lack of English-language primary source documentation on social credit, present significant barriers to understanding the realities of the system’s aims and functions. Without clear insight into the CSCS’s design, technologies, functions, policies, goals, and limits, U.S. policymakers and businesses are at a disadvantage in assessing how the CSCS may or may not evolve to negatively impact U.S. companies operating in China, or be leveraged by Chinese regulators to disadvantage or otherwise impact U.S. businesses. In this report, we draw on several thousand Chinese primary sources to describe what the system is and what it does.

So similar to our credit bureaus here, only in China they are determining your credit based on how you act, not your ability to repay debt. Apparently steering people with economic incentives just doesn't work well enough for the Chinese.

Multiple government bodies and state regulators control various blacklists relevant to their jurisdictional mandate and have administrative authority to determine which companies are added to such lists. Companies and individuals cannot be blacklisted on a completely arbitrary basis, as there are pre-determined types of violation that lead to blacklisting, but officials still hold discretionary power in terms of which violations are pursued and how severely violations are treated. China is currently working to further standardize the procedures for the creation of new blacklists, notifications, objections, blacklist removal and credit repair.

So yes, they can do whatever they want and there's nothing you can do about it.

This is a dark path to a dystopian future. If we start down this road, as the Chinese already have, we most likely will never come back.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

This is a great clip with Candice Owens. She's telling exactly what's going on, and why.

She makes a really good point. The Republicans are not trying to fight this at all. Which is my point. But it's more than just that. Why have Republicans not been in this battle all along, before the narrative was completely controlled by the left? Now, if they do try to fight back they will be labeled as racists. But then, isn't that what they claim to have been worried about all along?

There are more Republicans involved with this whole thing than most realize. You can't use an excuse like, "I don't want to be labeled as racist" when the leftists are going to do that regardless of what you do! And if you haven't done anything racist, they'll find someone throughout history that you, your family, someone that can be tied to you, did --in the past that might be construed as racist.

Right now the deck is stacked against regular American citizens, regardless of race.

Ron DeSantis is one of the only governors that has been outspoken about the whole Critical Race Theory indoctrination curriculum. Why are so few states NOT blocking this Critical Race Theory garbage?

Now do you see the big picture? The Republicans are largely in on this whole globalists takeover as well. Republicans have taken two of the hundreds of steps that could have stopped all this. There's no way that the republicans are not in on the downfall of America.

Candice is 100% correct in what she's saying, but she's wrong in assuming that the Republicans are weak. Republicans are not weak, they are compromised. They agree with what's going on, that's why so few Republican governors have pushed back against poisoning the minds of children!

Why haven't all Republican governors pushed back against Critical Race Theory? Ask yourself that question.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.