I've often said that anything which comes out and says "trust me" is usually not good. It's like "America's Favorite Cookie," or "Quality Tools." If it says, "Quality" on the box, it's safe to assume that there's probably a cheap knock off inside.

This brings me to my next point. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has released a statement about the integrity of the elections and the voting machines used in the election.

WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

"When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

"Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

"While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

There are already a few things wrong here. First, and foremost, how can the CISA claim that this is the most secure election ever, when it's only been a few days since the voting stopped? There hasn't even been an investigation into the allegations of fraud -- some of the states aren't done counting yet. Second, this statement only addresses the ballot scanning machines themselves, not the people operating them. Let's see who some of the people who "administer elections" are.

I'm sure we can trust that Katie Hobbs, Arizona Secretary of State, was in no way going to alter the election results. She believes that Trump's voting base is "Neo-Nazis." Is it hard to believe that she could have a bias towards Nazis? Is it also hard to believe that she might lie and cheat to save the world from Nazis?

Then there's this guy Joe Gloria. He want's to investigate fraud AFTER the election.

Another thing to consider is that these people happen to be in states that have contested elections. Funny how the states with little fraud claims don't have people like this charge?

But hey, to quote the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, "turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

There are people actively trying to steal this election. Like there have been in almost any election anywhere in the world. Knowing that voter/election fraud happens all over the world, why would we assume it didn't happen this time, on either side?

20% of people steal items when going through a self checkout line, but the Mainstream Media claims there's no evidence that any voter fraud occurred. Does anybody really believe that this was the first election anywhere that was fraud free? As Biden would say, "C'mon, man!?"

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I have been saying all along that I think that the people in the contested states are going to destroy the ballots so that they can't be recounted. Why not? Hillary destroyed devices and evidence, nothing happened. The Mueller investigative team destroyed devices and evidence, nothing happened. Why couldn't those who counted the votes in Pennsylvania Michigan and Wisconsin just destroy the ballots? Maybe there would be a fire, or another broken pipe. It would leave them undecipherable, then they would claim that the original vote stands.

Meanwhile they are parading Biden around as if he's the president, when the vote hasn't even been certified yet. This will just make it harder to push back when the actual votes are counted, if they are counted. But I believe that's the idea.

Now we have this!

Nevada Clark County Registrar of Voters, Joe Gloria, said his office has received allegations of voter fraud but will not investigate them until “post-election.”

“We do have some reports that have come in that we’re logging for reporting. But we’re definitely going to do an investigation, and we’ll deal with them once the canvass is finished,” Gloria (pictured) said during a Saturday press conference in response to questions involving potential voter fraud. However, the investigation will not start immediately.

“The votes are in the system at this point, so we’ll have to after the election, post-election, go after anything that’s been reported at this time,” he added.

How is this ensuring the integrity of the vote? How does this make anyone feel better about the process?

Let me get this straight. Joe Gloria wants the illegitimate votes to stand in the final total, then go back and see which ones were actually valid? In what world does this make sense?

This IS LITERAL election meddling. Leaving the invalid votes in the final total, knowingly, is perpetuating fraud! This man should be charged and removed from his position.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I have written about voter fraud many times before, but this time it's rampant. And it's primarily in target locations, battleground states, swing states and the like. So let's see who's in charge of the state legislatures in the states where election fraud is presumed.

As you can see. The state legislatures in these key states are Republican led. It's up to the state legislatures to set this right. They can correct the issues of voter fraud. Mandate recounts, and make the process transparent. In Pennsylvania Republicans had to file a law suit just to be able to get in and view the vote counting process.

A court in Pennsylvania ruled on Thursday morning that GOP observers must be allowed to watch ballot counting across the state.

“BREAKING: Appellate court in PA this morning ruling guarantees GOP observers can watch the ballot counts. They had been pushed away 16 sometimes 100 feet away,” Just The News reporter Carrie Sheffield tweeted.

She added that Trump deputy campaign manager Justin Clark said the ruling was a win for the Trump campaign. “I can’t stress enough how big a victory this is,” Clark said.

Why would anyone go to such lengths if there weren't something to hide. Just the idea of blocking people from watching is sketchy.

Then you have the interesting cases of Wisconsin and Michigan. Both states had a major uptick in Biden votes --overnight, but there's nothing to see here!

Elections officials in Michigan and Wisconsin refused to explain Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s sudden and dramatic vote tally increase that occurred in both states Wednesday morning.

Michigan and Wisconsin state officials warned against misinformation being shared online, but wouldn’t comment on specific vote tranches that appeared to show former Vice President Joe Biden suddenly receiving more votes than President Donald Trump. The two battleground states remained tightly contested as of Wednesday afternoon, according to The New York Times.

Voter tallies from both states spiked at around 6 a.m. in favor of Biden, according to graphs of live tallies posted by FiveThirtyEight. Trump tweeted multiple times Wednesday morning claiming that officials are finding votes for Biden “all over the place.”

“I would ask everyone to not repeat misinformation,” Michigan Sec. of State Jocelyn Benson told reporters at a Wednesday press conference when asked about the tallies that appeared to overwhelmingly favor Biden.

It's not misinformation if they are simply asking questions about it, it happened, that's documented. If the votes weren't wildly in favor of Biden, why not just say so? These "officials" are starting to rub many people the wrong way. There's obviously something strange going on.

Then you have the case of the voting machines switching votes from one candidate to the other. Can you guess which way the votes went. That's right they went from Trump to Biden! But this must be a "glitch." Here's a link to the video where Sidney Powell and Tom Fitton talk about the "irregularities" with Lou Dobbs.

https://youtu.be/fVDB8_JWL0c

I think there are any number of things they need to investigate. Including the likelihood that three percent of the vote total was changed in the pre-election voting ballots that were collected digitally by using the hammer program and a software program called scorecard. That would have amounted to a massive change in the vote that would have gone across the country and explains a lot of what we're seeing. In addition, they ran an algorithm to calculate votes they might need to come up with for Mr. Biden in specific areas. I think that explains what happened in Michigan where the computer glitch resulted in a change of votes of about 5500 in favor of president Trump just in one of 47 districts all those districts need to be checked for that same "software glitch." That would change the result in Michigan dramatically. The same thing is happening in other states we've had hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appear for solely for Mr. Biden which is statistically impossible as a matter of mathematics. It can all be documented we are putting it into materials that we will file in federal court and we need to seek relief in multiple states to enjoin the certification of any election results.

5500+ votes went to Biden, from Trump. This is what she was talking about.

An election-software glitch in Michigan's Antrim County that had incorrectly directed Democratic votes to presidential candidate Joe Biden was fixed Friday, putting thousands of votes correctly into President Trump's totals.

The software had reportedly caused a significant number of votes to be allotted to Biden in a county that has for years been reliably red. In the presumed final count, Biden had originally led in the county by roughly 3,000 votes. Revised totals show that Trump won the county by around 2,500.

Addressing the alleged software glitch, Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox said Friday during a press conference that "47 counties [in Michigan] use this same software in the same capacity."

"These counties that use this software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies," she said.

That's not a glitch, that's a "feature." ONLY if they can find somewhere that the machines replaced Biden votes with Trump votes, could it be otherwise.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I decided to see what was required to vote in Pennsylvania. What I found was amazing. It appears, at least from the official online voter registration form, that you don't even have to prove that you are a US citizen. There is a check box for, "I do not have a PA driver's license or PennDOT ID card or a Social Security number." If you check that box, you are unidentifiable --period. Is Pennsylvania going to allow non-citizens, or out of state citizens vote with provisional ballots?

Take a minute and scroll through this form.

There is a section where it mentions that it's illegal to lie on the form and that you might be fined $15,000 or could end up spending 7 years in prison or both. But this is absurd because the law is unenforceable. How are the authorities supposed to find someone with a fake name, no SSN and no driver's license or state issued ID? Answer: THEY AREN'T.

But it gets even worse. Now a Judge in Pennsylvania has ruled that they can extend the counting deadline, and the supreme court punted.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that extended the deadline for mail-in votes in the November election by three days.

But wait, it gets even more ridiculous. Pennsylvania Supreme Court says ballots can’t be rejected based on signature comparisons.

The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court ruled Friday that ballots in the state cannot be rejected because of signature comparisons, backing up guidance issued by the state’s chief elections officer heading into Pennsylvania’s first presidential election with no-excuse mail voting.

The ruling is a defeat for President Donald Trump’s campaign and other Republicans, who had challenged the decision by Pennsylvania election officials, arguing that efforts to match signatures on ballots to signatures on voter rolls were necessary to prevent fraud.

"We conclude that the Election Code does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots during the canvassing process based on an analysis of a voter’s signature,” the state Supreme Court wrote in an opinion signed by six of the seven justices, including five Democrats and one Republican.

The seventh justice, another Republican, concurred with the ruling.

The court directs "the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting, computing, and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons."

But there's even more to it than that. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court also said that the postmarks on the mail-in ballots don't have to be on or before the Nov. 3rd deadline (effectively extending mail-in voting). In fact there doesn't even have to be a postmark there at all.

But even more concerning to Republicans than extending the deadline is that the state Supreme Court also ruled that mail ballots without postmarks proving they were submitted before the election deadline on Nov. 3 will be counted. “We conclude that a ballot received on or before 5:00 p.m. on November 6, 2020, will be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day,” reads the decision.

So people who are unidentifiable, can mail in, or drop off ballots after the deadline? Is the state of Pennsylvania actively trying to invite fraud?

To illustrate the illogical decisions made; why not just allow vote counting BEFORE election day? Not an extension --count ahead of time, that makes sense. You can at least remove the impression that you're adding mail-in votes after the in-person votes have been counted (because that's the only reason for counting after the deadline). You already knew that there were going to be a record amount of votes counted. Why didn't Florida have these issues?

You might as well have people write who they want for president on a napkin and drop that off. After all, it's about the integrity of the vote right?

What do you think?

Buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

There are quite a few sites from which you can watch the election results come in. The two I'm going with are:

Newsmax and OANN (One America News Network).

You can stream OANN from 123news.tv.

You can stream Newsmax directly from their site.

So, if you're going to stay up and watch it all go down. These news channels might interest you. Plus I'm sure the coverage from Newsmax and OANN is going to be much more insightful than the national news networks, or Fox News for that matter.

It's going to be a long night. We won't know the winner by the end of the night. But I believe we'll have a pretty good chance of knowing which way it's going to tilt.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!