When reading this keep in mind this only concerns Georgia.

Why would there be an issue with candidates for Senate when the system was already validated? It’s just a list of names.

Why did the validated systems mess up right before the election, requiring a software patch to correct the issue. Which required Dominion techs to be onsite to perform the patch.

When it comes to these sorts of things I don’t believe in coincidences.

Consider this. What if Dominion had code specifically designed to cause the name errors AFTER a specific date. This would create the need for Dominion techs to come in and “patch” the machines AFTER they were validated. I'm not sure how the state approved changes to the machines after validation. That's very sketch to me as well.

The paper printed from the machine has a QR code on it. The QR codes are NOT unique. YOU CAN SCAN THE SAME PRINTOUT MULTIPLE TIMES, without verifying the voter ID! The voter ID should follow the printout. Even a 1-dollar bill has a serial number on it!
Now you know why they don't want Republican poll watchers to watch the counting.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) released a statement, "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

Multiple scanning of printouts can also account for the ridiculous 90% turnout in some areas of Wisconsin and Michigan.

This was not overlooked, the machines were designed this way on purpose.

you ever wondered how the FDA can track tainted foods down to the farm, and the date they were packaged? They even know when and where they were shipped to.

I have worked in FDA regulated facilities. They require pretty much everything you do be documented. Changing a validated system after the fact is illegal. As well as falsifying data are illegal.

Here's a link to: CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Keep in mind this is only: PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.

If you notice everything is very well thought out. There are controls in place to make sure that nobody can alter records, and if they try, there are methods by which it can be determined they have been tampered with. Why can't we have the same level of controls in place for voting? It's really not that complicated. Put controls in place that "keep people honest." It can be done.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

The following states are locking down again --just in time for the holiday season! When it comes to the Democrats, I don't believe in coincidences.

1. Minnesota
2. Maryland
3. California
4. Iowa
5. Wisconsin
6. Utah
7. Rhode Island
8. Michigan
9. Connecticut
10. Massachusetts
11. Illinois
12. Colorado
13. Idaho
14. Florida
15. New York
16.New Jersey
17. Pennsylvania
18. Texas
19. Kentucky
20. Mississippi
21. Nebraska
22. New Mexico

So the question is why? We know that lockdowns are ineffective, mostly because the virus has been all over the world now since at least September of last year. So the question should be, why lock it down now?

After watching the news here lately it has become apparent that the Democrats want to try and pass another Corona Virus Relief Bill. That's code for Democrat slush fund.

But there's two things in the way. First there's the Republicans, tired of the slush funds, they'll block it if it's total pork. Then there's the fact that the economy is doing much better now. There's less need for a stimulus with things rebounding economically.

Most people are talking about diminishing freedoms, tyrannical rules instated by Democrats, cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas. While these things are all true, the reason behind it is not a power grab in the way you might think.

The reason for the lockdown measures is simple. Democrats need more economic disarray. Once the people in the lockdown states are squeezed economically, the Democrats will use the economic damage as leverage to blame Republicans for the Relief Bill not getting passed.

It's always the same with the Democrats. Create a crisis, then use that as leverage to get your way legislatively. They are killing two birds with one stone, making the Republicans look bad, and testing how much freedom they can grab in one swoop.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I've often said that anything which comes out and says "trust me" is usually not good. It's like "America's Favorite Cookie," or "Quality Tools." If it says, "Quality" on the box, it's safe to assume that there's probably a cheap knock off inside.

This brings me to my next point. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has released a statement about the integrity of the elections and the voting machines used in the election.

WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

"When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

"Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

"While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

There are already a few things wrong here. First, and foremost, how can the CISA claim that this is the most secure election ever, when it's only been a few days since the voting stopped? There hasn't even been an investigation into the allegations of fraud. Second, this statement only addresses the ballot scanning machines themselves, not the people operating them. Let's see who some of the people who "administer elections" are.

I'm sure we can trust that Katie Hobbs, Arizona Secretary of State, was in no way going to alter the election results. She believes that Trumps voting base is "Neo-Nazis." Is it hard to believe that she could have a bias towards Nazis? Is it also hard to believe that she might lie and cheat to save the world from Nazis?

Then there's this guy Joe Gloria. He want's to investigate fraud AFTER the election.

Another thing to consider is that these people happen to be in states that have contested elections. Funny how the states with little fraud claims don't have people like this charge?

But hey, to quote the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, "turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

There are people actively trying to steal this election. Like there have been in almost any election anywhere in the world. Knowing that voter/election fraud happens all over the world, why would we assume it didn't happen this time, on either side?

20% of people steal items when going through a self checkout line, but the Mainstream Media claims there's no evidence that any voter fraud occurred. Does anybody really believe that this was the first election anywhere that was fraud free? As Biden would say, "C'mon, man!?"

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I have been saying all along that I think that the people in the contested states are going to destroy the ballots so that they can't be recounted. Why not? Hillary destroyed devices and evidence, nothing happened. The Mueller investigative team destroyed devices and evidence, nothing happened. Why couldn't those who counted the votes in Pennsylvania Michigan and Wisconsin just destroy the ballots? Maybe there would be a fire, or another broken pipe. It would leave them undecipherable, then they would claim that the original vote stands.

Meanwhile they are parading Biden around as if he's the president, when the vote hasn't even been certified yet. This will just make it harder to push back when the actual votes are counted, if they are counted. But I believe that's the idea.

Now we have this!

Nevada Clark County Registrar of Voters, Joe Gloria, said his office has received allegations of voter fraud but will not investigate them until “post-election.”

“We do have some reports that have come in that we’re logging for reporting. But we’re definitely going to do an investigation, and we’ll deal with them once the canvass is finished,” Gloria (pictured) said during a Saturday press conference in response to questions involving potential voter fraud. However, the investigation will not start immediately.

“The votes are in the system at this point, so we’ll have to after the election, post-election, go after anything that’s been reported at this time,” he added.

How is this ensuring the integrity of the vote? How does this make anyone feel better about the process?

Let me get this straight. Joe Gloria wants the illegitimate votes to stand in the final total, then go back and see which ones were actually valid? In what world does this make sense?

This IS LITERAL election meddling. Leaving the invalid votes in the final total, knowingly, is perpetuating fraud! This man should be charged and removed from his position.

End of Post:

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I have written about voter fraud many times before, but this time it's rampant. And it's primarily in target locations, battleground states, swing states and the like. So let's see who's in charge of the state legislatures in the states where election fraud is presumed.

As you can see. The state legislatures in these key states are Republican led. It's up to the state legislatures to set this right. They can correct the issues of voter fraud. Mandate recounts, and make the process transparent. In Pennsylvania Republicans had to file a law suit just to be able to get in and view the vote counting process.

A court in Pennsylvania ruled on Thursday morning that GOP observers must be allowed to watch ballot counting across the state.

“BREAKING: Appellate court in PA this morning ruling guarantees GOP observers can watch the ballot counts. They had been pushed away 16 sometimes 100 feet away,” Just The News reporter Carrie Sheffield tweeted.

She added that Trump deputy campaign manager Justin Clark said the ruling was a win for the Trump campaign. “I can’t stress enough how big a victory this is,” Clark said.

Why would anyone go to such lengths if there weren't something to hide. Just the idea of blocking people from watching is sketchy.

Then you have the interesting cases of Wisconsin and Michigan. Both states had a major uptick in Biden votes --overnight, but there's nothing to see here!

Elections officials in Michigan and Wisconsin refused to explain Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s sudden and dramatic vote tally increase that occurred in both states Wednesday morning.

Michigan and Wisconsin state officials warned against misinformation being shared online, but wouldn’t comment on specific vote tranches that appeared to show former Vice President Joe Biden suddenly receiving more votes than President Donald Trump. The two battleground states remained tightly contested as of Wednesday afternoon, according to The New York Times.

Voter tallies from both states spiked at around 6 a.m. in favor of Biden, according to graphs of live tallies posted by FiveThirtyEight. Trump tweeted multiple times Wednesday morning claiming that officials are finding votes for Biden “all over the place.”

“I would ask everyone to not repeat misinformation,” Michigan Sec. of State Jocelyn Benson told reporters at a Wednesday press conference when asked about the tallies that appeared to overwhelmingly favor Biden.

It's not misinformation if they are simply asking questions about it, it happened, that's documented. If the votes weren't wildly in favor of Biden, why not just say so? These "officials" are starting to rub many people the wrong way. There's obviously something strange going on.

Then you have the case of the voting machines switching votes from one candidate to the other. Can you guess which way the votes went. That's right they went from Trump to Biden! But this must be a "glitch." Here's a link to the video where Sidney Powell and Tom Fitton talk about the "irregularities" with Lou Dobbs.

https://youtu.be/fVDB8_JWL0c

I think there are any number of things they need to investigate. Including the likelihood that three percent of the vote total was changed in the pre-election voting ballots that were collected digitally by using the hammer program and a software program called scorecard. That would have amounted to a massive change in the vote that would have gone across the country and explains a lot of what we're seeing. In addition, they ran an algorithm to calculate votes they might need to come up with for Mr. Biden in specific areas. I think that explains what happened in Michigan where the computer glitch resulted in a change of votes of about 5500 in favor of president Trump just in one of 47 districts all those districts need to be checked for that same "software glitch." That would change the result in Michigan dramatically. The same thing is happening in other states we've had hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appear for solely for Mr. Biden which is statistically impossible as a matter of mathematics. It can all be documented we are putting it into materials that we will file in federal court and we need to seek relief in multiple states to enjoin the certification of any election results.

5500+ votes went to Biden, from Trump. This is what she was talking about.

An election-software glitch in Michigan's Antrim County that had incorrectly directed Democratic votes to presidential candidate Joe Biden was fixed Friday, putting thousands of votes correctly into President Trump's totals.

The software had reportedly caused a significant number of votes to be allotted to Biden in a county that has for years been reliably red. In the presumed final count, Biden had originally led in the county by roughly 3,000 votes. Revised totals show that Trump won the county by around 2,500.

Addressing the alleged software glitch, Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox said Friday during a press conference that "47 counties [in Michigan] use this same software in the same capacity."

"These counties that use this software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies," she said.

That's not a glitch, that's a "feature." ONLY if they can find somewhere that the machines replaced Biden votes with Trump votes, could it be believed otherwise.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!