Freedom is the Heart of Liberty!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS!

Permalink 12/12/20 10:08, by OGRE / (Jeff), Categories: News, Background, In real life, History, Politics, Elections

This Civil-Rights Attorney Leigh Dundas points out some things that I believe very few people are aware of. Including those who are commiting the fraud against the American people and The Constitution of The United States of America.

We've been operating under a state of emergency since 2018 and I don't think many Americans know this.

Watch the entire video and I think that you'll be amazed.

The only reason it's still on YouTube is probably because they're using it to get the word out to all of the people involved in stealing the election!

Here is the text of the Executive Order from the White House Website.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):

(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results; and

(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to, disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.

The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations, when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.

(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the Director of National Intelligence any information relevant to the execution of the Director’s duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of the report mandated by section 1(a) of this order, the Director, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies, shall amend the report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall amend the report required by section 1(b), as appropriate.

(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency or any other appropriate official from tendering to the President, at any time through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information, assessment, or evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.

(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a State, tribal, or local election within the United States has occurred is identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment mandated by section 1(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, or submitted to the President in an independent report.

(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their respective responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be classified in whole or in part, shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner that maintains methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments; ensures that efforts to protect electoral processes and institutions are insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free speech and open debate.

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.

(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order.

Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b):

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b), and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section 2(b) of this order; and

(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall jointly prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, including, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted foreign person:

(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction;

(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior review and approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods or services;

(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing credit to a person;

(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;

(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or by, through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;

(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of a person;

(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from the United States;

(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive officers of any of the sanctions described in this section; or

(ix) any other measures authorized by law.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.

Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;

(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;

(e) the term “United States election” means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;

(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;

(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state, provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other than the United States;

(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and

(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.

Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.

Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

September 12, 2018.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Leave a comment »

1212/20 Saturday Fun! Smashing Pumpkins

Permalink 12/12/20 05:20, by OGRE / (Jeff), Categories: Welcome, Background, Fun, In real life, On the web

I was peeking around Parler earlier today and saw what is probably one of the funniest things I've seen in a log time! It's a very short video, but anyone who was a teenager in the 1900s will appreciate this.




Which of course reminded me of this comedy bit by Stephen Lynch.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Leave a comment »

Where Are The Results of The Dominion Audit in Michigan?

Permalink 12/11/20 10:07, by OGRE / (Jeff), Categories: Welcome, News, Background, In real life, On the web, Politics, Elections

You can't see the results of the audit. A Michigan judge has put a block on the release of the audit findings.

Judge Kevin Elsenheimer has blocked the release of the Dominion audit data at the request of Michigan AG Dana Nessel. You might remember her as The strange anti-Merry Christmas lady.

Here is video from "Lou Dobs Tonight."

Can anyone tell me why they can't release the audit data from the Dominion audit? After all this was, "The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history" says the CISA.

"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

"When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

People went to their elections officials and couldn't get answers. So they went to the court and demanded to audit the machines. When the audit was complete, the Judge and the state's AG blocked the results of the audit from becoming public information.

Are we supposed to trust officials, who won't show us what they've found? Hiding things is not instilling trust in the process or the system. If this doesn't hint to Dominion machines being rigged, I don't know what does.

This is like asking someone in a card game, "Do you have cards up your sleeve?" Then they say, "No, I don't have any cards up my sleeve, but you also can't look!"

The sad part is that many of these officials probably thought that the machines weren't rigged. They might have actually bought the lie that they were going to count votes as you would expect them to. Or, they are complicit in the stealing of the election and were caught red handed, either way it's bad for them.

I think that the audit proved that the machines were rigged and now these people don't want to be caught with their pants down. Because they know that when the information reaches the public, they are going to be help accountable for the fact that nobody looked over the machines, or allowed the machines to be altered in violation of state law. Or at the very least allowed them to be altered in a way that was "just minor enough" to avoid revalidating the machines.

The fact that there is a level to which an update doesn't require recertification is ridiculous. Do you think that Walmart would replace all of the cash registers' software and not test them before they start ringing up items? Of course not, because they don't want to loose money or have the system crash in the middle of a busy day.

This whole thing has been a joke. The fact that the CISA came out 3 days after the election to claim, "The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history" is absurd. This came out 3 days after the election. Votes were still being counted all over the country. How could the CISA know that the process was secure before it's even close to being completed?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Leave a comment »

This is A Great Analysis From Pearson Sharp At OANN

Permalink 12/07/20 07:59, by OGRE / (Jeff), Categories: Welcome, News, In real life, On the web, Politics, U.S. Economy, Elections

Pearson Sharp from OANN breaks it all down.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Leave a comment »

Christmas Lights and We The Sheeple

Permalink 12/05/20 23:44, by OGRE / (Jeff), Categories: Welcome, Background, On the web, History, Politics, Elections

Leftists cultivate failure. When you convince a huge swath of people that the majority of their problems are because of other people, or other people's actions; those who feel wronged often tend to wait on something to be done about it.

In come the Democrats to save the day!

But that’s the dirty little secret. Democrats were never and are never going to do anything about the problems they claim other people are causing. What they are going to do is create a permanent group of people who are collectively chasing the same carrot. But it goes a level further than that. There is no carrot to be had. There’s only the illusion of one.

What I can’t figure out is why they keep chasing it?

But then I went looking at Christmas lights last night, and I think I know now how the Hope-Nosis works!

So, we went to go see the Christmas lights in a neighborhood in Jacksonville Florida. Little did we know that there was going to be CRAZY traffic. I could see if it took 30 minutes or so to get close to the neighborhood, but this was more like 2+ hours! Or at least it would have been.

If you look at the map below; I show the path that all of the people were taking to look at the Christmas lights. Everywhere along the red line, cars were literally stopped. People were getting out of their cars and walking down the road to see what was happening. They were all following each other.

I wasn't about to sit in traffic all night, the kids would be asleep before we even arrived to see the lights.

I told my wife and her friend that we can just drive down the middle lane a few hundred feet, it's a turn lane, but there's no cars there, because nobody was moving. We drove down the middle turn lane and went left, which got us around about 10 minutes of traffic (1). Then I immediately made a U-turn and went straight at the light. Now we had skipped all of the traffic and were on the road much closer to the lights.

Once on that road we were sitting again. So I decided to drive down the middle turn lane again, probably about 1 mile. This time I came up to where everyone was entering the neighborhood with the lights (2). People going right were making a circle through the neighborhood counter clockwise. But there was nobody going the other way? It's a two-lane road, so I said, "Screw this! We're going left and following it around clockwise." So we did. We were literally the only car going that way. We had nobody in front of us, and could cruise through the lights at our own pace. There was one point that a car was behind us, but it was someone that lived in that neighborhood.

These pictures were taken on the last leg of the ride, where there were people in front and behind us (5). Again we didn't try to turn right to get out to the main road (6). We went straight and then went left at the main road and made it home in no time.

The moral of my overly descriptive story: I think that many people have been convinced it's better to just go along, or they are not willing to think outside the box. THERE ARE FAR TOO MANY FOLLOWERS living in the US right now.

Those people following the Democrat carrot, are the same people that sat in a line of cars for 2+ hours waiting to see Christmas lights. I'm not one of them!

Leave a comment »

:: Next >>

January 2021
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
I believe that for the United States of America to survive, we will have to get back to our roots.

Search

XML Feeds

blog software

©2021 by Jeff Michaels

Contact | Help | Blog templates by Asevo | blog tool | managed server | evoTeam