Originally from my Substack "Siegbarste Newsletter" (before Substack began censoring speech).

This article really explains the situation well.

The Democrat ballot gathering apparatus was collapsed by anonymous Wisconsin heroes

“There is a big difference between “votes” and “ballots.” The Republicans focused on winning votes; the Democrats focused on gathering ballots. The ballots won,” the Conservative Treehouse opined.

The phantom voter or address serves as the raw material for the ballot-gathering strategy. Each ballot must be associated with someone – even if that is only a name on a list.

A large number of live voting ballots accumulate at addresses where the voter indicated on the ballot does not live. As a result of the ballots gathered, the electoral victory inventory has been created. The person who gathers them will be able to vote with them.

And I will add to that, the person who gathers those ballots will be able to vote with them legally!

Since there is no signature verification, and no chain of custody, all you need is a ballot, a name from the voter roll, and “some” address. This has been glossed over by nearly every single conservative pundit that I’ve seen to date, except for Sundance, and Jeff Miller.

Kari Lake was never going to win in AZ because this is exactly the technique they used. They have an endless supply of fake/phantom voters to backfill any offset that they might come across — and it’s all LEGAL. That’s right. There aren’t going to be any court cases that stop this, because the law currently allows for it. Also, if they keep the difference greater than 0.5% there will be no recount either. All that might happen is that this technique will become more widely known/exposed. Remember that Katie Hobbs never even campaigned, or debated Kari Lake, because she already knew that she didn’t have to. Katie Hobbs didn’t need “votes/voters” she just needed ballots.

But how to fix it, or stop it? That is where Jeff Miller goes with this.

Quiet, anonymous Wisconsin heroes, working in a small office, virtually unfunded – proved how to collapse the Democrat ballot gathering apparatus.

For the ballot-gathering strategy to work, Democrats need tens of thousands of phantom addresses and voters. A few is not enough. Without thousands of loose ballots tied to phantoms, the edifice comes crashing down.

…

Fractal Programming technology, funded by Mike Lindell, was applied by the Wisconsin election heroes at scale in order to locate and challenge phantoms. You can find more information about the process at www.Omega4America.com.

“They went to scores of county registrars and challenged thousands of phantoms – proof in hand. Quietly, below the radar, they showed registrars, whose job it is, that Bill Jones was not a real person. They helped clean up addresses that were wrong – either typos or fake,” The Pundit explains.

Any one of those addresses was a landing pad for a loose ballot.

On election day, the Wisconsin Democrats did not have enough phantoms or mail-in ballots to go around. A Republican senator might have been saved by these actions.

The good news of the now permanent ballot gathering strategy is that the Democrats need to keep voter rolls fat with the dead, people living in U.P.S. boxes and RV Parks. They need to physically gather all those floating ballots and vote them.

This is why ERIC was controlled by Democrat operatives.

“Clever Leftists built a national system, ERIC, now used by about 30 states, to make sure voter rolls protected phantoms. Using in-your-face messaging, ERIC claimed it was a resource to keep voter rolls clean,” The Gateway Pundit reports.

ERIC was never about cleaning voter rolls, it was about making sure that voter rolls stay perpetually dirty and full of invalid “registered voters.” Phantoms to make sure that the ballot gathering could take place where needed.

Now that more people are catching on to how this works — LET’S FIX IT. Many Republicans have benefited from this method as well, which is why they are never going to do anything about it on their own. If that were the case, the Republican legislatures in GA, NC, PA, AZ, WI, and MI would have stopped it before 2020. But they didn’t, and they still haven’t.

It’s up to the public to do this.

Follow-up Article.

If you enjoy my writing, you could buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

This is my running stream of thought on AI.

There are many things up in the air as AI is concerned. The most troubling is data center land grabs. There are many palces where data centers have been proposed, and the local citizenry is opposed. This has sparked debate, because many of the local politicians have worked to get the data centers pushed through -- without the consent of their constituents.

Five months after Grosser turned them down, local officials said at a public meeting that Mason County was being scouted as a location for a new data center development.

Grosser experienced firsthand what has become a common but controversial aspect of the multibillion-dollar data center boom, fueled by artificial intelligence services. Major tech companies launching the huge projects across the country are asking land sellers and public officials to sign NDAs to limit discussions about details of the projects in exchange for morsels of information and the potential of economic lifelines for their communities. It often leaves neighbors searching for answers about the futures of their communities.

The construction of such hyperscale data centers — giant facilities that house servers and computing resources — is booming nationwide. President Donald Trump’s AI action plan and related executive orders have recently facilitated their speedy approval, in part by loosening environmental regulations from clean air and water laws. Hundreds of projects were announced last year, touted by developers and many local officials as economic boosts to local economies.

People are obviously being paid off. When NDAs are involved, there is money changing hands, and the people slinging the money don't want people finding out who they are.

There's an even stranger side to this though.

Nvidia is about to enter the PC market. Why? Because they say that AI is going to be moving more towards edge devices. The AI will be built-in to the devices we use, not hosted elsewhere.

TAIPEI, June 1 (Reuters) - Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab on Monday unveiled a new chip ​that puts artificial intelligence capabilities directly into laptops and desktop computers, pitting it against the likes of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab and Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab.

The chip, developed with Taiwan's MediaTek (2454.TW), opens new tab, will debut this fall in laptops and compact desktops from Dell (DELL.N), opens new tab, HP (HPQ.N), opens new tab, Lenovo (0992.HK), opens new tab, ASUS (2357.TW), opens new tab, Microsoft Surface and MSI, with models from Acer and GIGABYTE to follow.

Industry experts said the processor would overhaul engagement with AI as it is designed to ​run autonomous AI agents locally rather than relying solely on cloud computing.

This begs the question -- "What are all the data centers for -- if most AI will be moving to edge devices?"

Something's not right here.

Tell me what you think in the comments.

If you enjoy my writing, you could buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

For me this is another example of, “One side pushed to hard, and now the pendulum is swinging back the other way.”

Feminists have gone so far to emasculate men, that they are now seen [by men] as an existential threat.

Feminism has become embedded into nearly all parts of American culture.

The Feminization of Story Telling

Stories, at least traditionally, were always a means of learning. People told stories over generations, because it was how people passed knowledge from one generation to the next.

These stories often involved women, who by no fault of their own, got themselves into bad situations. It was at this point that a man would come to save her. A knight, or someone virtuous would rescue her (the idea being -- it is virtuous to save women) and then everything would work out in the end.

This process has been hijacked by those who wish to portray a new kind of story. Not one where women need to be protected -- but one where the women do the protecting.

This inversion is instinctively rejected by males. Well, by most males. See, this is not the way that things work in real life. These kinds of ideals can’t be unwound -- because they’re not social constructs -- they are the way that humans (on a civilizational scale) have survived for as long as we can tell.

Feminists have taken it upon themselves to change the perception of reality. Men aren’t supposed to protect women, in fact most men are portrayed in stories today as being idiots. Many people have written about this, Eric Rogers is one that comes to mind.

That’s precisely what’s been done, over several decades, to the cultural image of the virtuous man, to the image of a hero. This wasn’t aesthetic drift. It wasn’t just a change in taste or storytelling. It was a systematic and deliberate suppression of something that would otherwise tell the truth. We didn’t merely lose the image of an admirable man from our media, it was actively replaced with a distortion designed to make the original unrecognizable.

As with any movement, it grew subtly over time. The first signs were hard to pick up on, but during the ‘80s and ‘90s, the dominant image of the man in American popular culture became the bumbling husband: Homer Simpson, Ray Barone, Al Bundy. Men who might not have been villains, but they lacked almost any redeemable qualities. Importantly, these characters were seen as relatable, “normal guys.” Heroes were still on the big screen, like Kurt Russel and Mel Gibson, but the hero was starting to be seen as a fantasy, while the slob was the truth.

The idea is for the male figure in Western media is to be a loser, and not worthy of the woman. This serves many purposes, but here are two that immediately come to mind.

1. It keeps the male/female divide intact. It does this by keeping men on the defensive (as they are conceptualized as fools and incompetent). Not a good starting point.

2. Women are more likely to see foreign men as competent. This is because most foreign films don’t portray men as fools. Netflix is a prime example of this. If you’ve ever watched any of the foreign stories that are dubbed in English, the men are portrayed as regular men. They are not portrayed as fools.

This is ironic, because the same people who are pushing the “Western Men Are Idiots” narrative -- are the same people inviting violent third world men into Western countries. And we all know where that leads. 🙄

Men Are Terrible And They Will Hurt You

As with most ideologies, nearly everything “feminist” operates from a simple binary baseline.

Feminists filter the actions of men -- through a filter resembling this: Men are angry, spiteful, power hungry, and aggressive -- at all times. In fact, when men are not being aggressive, they’re scheming, there must be a game afoot. Things are never as they seem, don’t trust your senses.

Feminism does not account for gray areas. It can’t, because that might allow for honest observations. You can’t have honest observations -- of a binary enemy. They’re bad -- that’s it -- end of discussion.

Feminism makes me think of a role-reversed version of the rap song "Bitches Ain't Shit." Feminism operates on that level of complexity.

Jenn And The Unveiling of Crazy

Around 10 years back, I still had a personal Facebook account that I would look at every once in a while when I was bored. This was right around the time when Trump was elected the first time.

There were a few people on there that I would talk to from time to time. People I went to high school with, I graduated in 1998, so it was 18 years prior that I was in school with any of those people, or people that I used to work with.

I was scrolling through my feed when I saw a message from a girl I went to high school with. In that 18-year span she had become a teacher.

She posted something to the effect of, “Now that Trump has been elected, I’m worried that rapes are going to increase all over the country!” I thought that she was joking. NO -- she was 100% serious!

I went to her Facebook page and poked around, there was all this bizarre leftist stuff. There was a picture of her classroom door, covered in a giant piece of paper that said, “We love our Brown kids, Black kids, Asian kids…” Every ethnic group you could think of, but there as no mention of White kids (I wonder how those kids felt in her class). She was a full-on Social Justice Warrior!

She posted something else to do with men raping women, because of Trump. I mentioned to her, “You do understand that everyone you knew the day before -- is still the same person today. Nothing changed overnight because Trump was elected. There was no switch that flipped to make people act differently.”

It didn’t matter, she already blocked me. She blocked me -- for pointing out the obvious.

This took me completely by surprise as she was one of the people in school who “bucked the system.” I never would have imagined that she would have been pulled in by leftist ideology. But then, she was still single. There was no man in the picture to guide her, as a result, she strayed into the wilderness, and was targeted by feminists.

She was an attractive woman, and feminists seek attractive women when they can. They know that women who are attractive have much more sway with men (and generally hold a higher social status) and so they are targeted relentlessly, because of their persuasive abilities.

On Facebook, many other people were writing insane nonsense as well. All of Facebook seemed awash with people who were not in control of their emotions, and seemed generally crazy.

None of those people were worth engaging with in discussion because they were mental basket cases, who checked under their bed at night to make sure Trump wasn’t hiding under there.

All I could think was, “These are the people they have teaching kids? Seriously?!”

Feminists Are Gatekeepers

Feminists have also become embedded into the gateways (entry points) by which most men attempt to “make something of themselves” -- the job market.

First men have to beat the “Algorithm Game,” then they often have to woo the feminist HR interviewers.

I’ll explain.

Men, especially young men are tired of dealing with gatekeepers. Everyone is tired of dealing with people who hate them -- generally -- and those same people [who hate you] are at the entryway to almost any career.

It reminds me of building your financial credit. You can’t get a credit card (with a decent credit rate) because you’ve never had a credit card before. But you can’t really build your credit without a credit card. 🤔 So you get screwed over early -- when you’re trying to build something -- so that later when credit is less important, you can “potentially” get a better interest rate? Credit in general is a scam, but that’s a whole different topic.

The subject of feminism is interesting to me, not because I’ve personally had to deal with it so much, but because I’ve watched other people have to deal with it. And it is complete BS, there’s no real navigable path for young men today. It all depends on your available resources, and whether or not your family will, or can, help you or not.

I’m a rather attractive guy, so the harpies treat me differently than less attractive guys. I know how to flirt in a non-threatening way -- and this makes a huge difference! Women like to be the center of attention (at all times) even in that attention is not destined to go anywhere (and they know that). I’m sure you’ve heard, “It’s nice to be wanted” before.

You could be a less attractive man, and know how to talk to people, and go far.

If you’re less attractive and spiteful, or non-positive in your general demeanor (or otherwise have low self esteem) -- then you’re not getting hired.

It’s almost like the women are hiring men -- based on whether or not they would date them.

I know I’ll be attacked on this -- but it’s 100% true! And all you ladies out there know it. 😉👉

Men do the same thing!

Why do so many accomplished men have secretaries that are attractive? Because it’s a status symbol. Nobody has to explain “why” they hired her, “Just look at her! Would you turn her away?!”

The same thing is happening to men now. The entry points for men have swapped. Instead of men hiring competent men, there’s women hiring men based on their “likability” not merit.

Women don’t care about merit. They care if they find you attractive as a possible mate, why you might up their social status. Biology just works that way.

That’s why so many dating/hiring websites are always about “confidence” and “showing that you can handle the situation.” Not by proven facts -- but by the way that you come off in a short conversation.

That’s not hiring -- that’s speed dating!

Women Don’t Need Men, It’s Men Who Need The Women

Feminists have used this phrase for around 40 years.

‘Behind every great man there’s a great woman’ [it] was adopted as a slogan for the 1960/70s feminist movement, first having been used in the 1940s.

“Behind every great man there’s a great woman.” Which is very convenient for feminists.

See, it was never the men, it was really the women -- who were managing the men -- which allowed Great Men to become great.

You know, people like Genghis Khan. Who was most definitely “lead from behind” by all of the thousands of women he slept with.

Historical estimates suggest Genghis Khan slept with thousands of women, with some records indicating a harem of 2,000 to 3,000 concubines. This prolific reproductive history is backed by genetic studies showing that approximately 1 in 200 men today are his direct descendants. To understand how these numbers are possible, we must first analyze the genetic evidence that confirms his massive biological footprint.

There are more men of renown who were never married, or widowed before they reached their apex in society.

• Isaac Newton
• Nikola Tesla
• Henry David Thoreau
• Leonardo Da Vinci
• Thomas Jefferson (had been widowed for 19 years when he was elected as the third President).

It was not women who made these men great; however, it was the individual achievements of these men that made them great.

One can argue whether their achievements are “great” or not, but one cannot argue that they were lead by women because they simply were not. Who might have been the woman that recommended that Genghis Khan sleep with thousands of women?

Men don’t seek a name for themselves -- because a woman suggests it. Men seek greatness because these things are inherent.

Someone born into royalty doesn’t require a woman to tell them that they need to keep things going. It becomes 100% obvious at a young age. Either you keep the status quo -- or you likely get slimmed. Not to mention, most of the people surrounding young royalty -- are not relatives -- and often times not the mother of the child. That’s just the way things were.

The mother was often required for other formal viewings, and could not “be there” for her child.

None of that really matters though, because for feminism to “work” the woman needs to be the primary source of influence -- always. Not some male who might possibly poison the mind of another male, providing an alternate point of view.

You know what else doesn’t allow any alternate point of view? A CULT. Yes an actual cult. Which is what feminism really is.

Let me break it down my own way.

From personal experience, a cult is anything that says, “Whatever you thought you knew is 100% wrong.” That’s the first giveaway. Not that people somewhere along the way, might have been “mistaken” -- no, they are “wrong” -- and they are knowingly “wrong” -- because they are trying to deceive you.

Similarly, cults often call on their followers to be "true believers" who sacrifice themselves for the cause. Feminism does this as well -- except for those at the top.

Feminism has all the classic marks of a cult. But it’s a cult that’s been mainstreamed by a large extent of society.

So, what do we do now?

Tell me in the comments...

If you enjoy my writing, you could buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

Yes it's possible to have that cup of coffee with full flavor -- and the oils that come from the coffee beans. But you don't need a French press to do it. In fact, I'll show you how I did it with $12 a drip coffee maker.

French press coffee is always better tasting, the flavor is more robust, and there is an oily film at the top of the coffee, I'm sure it enhances the flavor somehow, there's also a small amount of grounds that end up in the finished product as well.

When I'm done making coffee I always prop open the lid to my drip coffee maker with a clothespin, so it can dry out a little and cool off. Then I can dump the grounds and filter, rinse everything out, and get it ready again.

However, if I have a day where I have to leave first thing in the morning, I might not dump the filter and grounds until later at night, or the next day.

One morning I was getting ready to make my coffee and I noticed something. There was a dark ring around the top edge of the paper filter. When I took a closer look, I realized that the dark ring was oily.

This means the oily residue is being caught up in the paper filters I've been using. I thought to myself, "Perhaps that's why drip coffee, passed through a paper filter, never tastes as good as the French press coffee."

I wanted to find a way to replicate that French press flavor, not stripping the oils, not having to heat up a kettle, or spend time cleaning the French press each morning.

Then it dawned on me. I just need a filter made of something non-absorbent. I went on Amazon and started peeking around and found this.

Price $12.98 from Amazon

I figured that this might do the trick, as the holes are small, but not so small that they will stop all of the little bits of grounds from getting through.

I tried it out as soon as it arrived. It was not good. The coffee was very weak, and tasteless.

The filter has holes in the bottom as well as the sides, so there's nothing to keep the water from displacing the grounds -- and dripping through -- where it just displaced them. Which was exactly what was happening. Just like this picture showing how easy it is to clean.

So, I figured, perhaps I could put something in it that would cover part of the bottom. I used a shot glass first, something I knew the hot water wouldn't ruin, but would cover a portion of the bottom. It made the coffee a little bit better, but still not like the French press.

Then I thought, "Why even have openings at the bottom of the filter at all? Why not force the water to pass through the grounds, by blocking the entire bottom portion of the filter?"

After measuring, the precise dimension of the bottom of the filter, I looked for something to cover the entire bottom of the filter and found this.

Price $9.99 from Amazon

It's the perfect size, covering the entire bottom of the filter, forcing the water to pass through the grounds before exiting the sides.

You can see in this next photo, that the water level in the basket is about 1/3 of the way up from the bottom. All of the grounds are floating or submerged. That is precisely what I was looking for.

I used it the first time, and it was great! Perfect French press-tasting coffee, but without all the hassle.

Let me know what you think in the comments.

If you enjoy my writing, you could buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

Amelia started out as a government initiated “anti extremist” game.

Kind of like those work training videos, where you have to select the “correct” action based on some fictional scenario.

But Amelia backfired spectacularly. Not only that, but the story behind the character Amelia is even more bizarre.

The UK Guardian covered the Amelia meme.

One of the reasons they chose a goth chick was supposedly:

“There has been a lot of misrepresentation unfortunately,” he said. “The game does not state, for example, that questioning mass migration is inherently wrong.”

Others have suggested the initiative had backfired, not least by casting a “cute goth girl” as a negative character, leading to her inadvertently becoming a focus of admiration. But Bergamini said the game – which used feedback from focus groups with young people and was developed with a specific local threat picture in mind – continued to be used and feedback from schools and others was positive.

This is hilarious, because this makes the meme even more legit.

This suggests that there really is some place in the UK where there are goth chicks leading the charge against third world mass migration!

Brilliant!

There is more background here.

Here are the two best videos of Amelia I’ve seen so far (Note: I did not create either of these videos):

The prompts were simple.

First, I told ⁦@grok⁩ to look at every single Amelia meme on the Internet.

Second, I said: “Become Amelia, then make a video and tell the British people what you want them to know.”

Here’s the surprising result. pic.twitter.com/dGY0OvKcQ4

— Huff (@Huff4Congress) January 16, 2026

And this one, where she spans multiple media formats:

Amelia isn’t going away, @Keir_Starmer @10DowningStreet @RoyalFamily @KensingtonRoyal @BBCNews @SkyNews @ukhomeoffice @ShabanaMahmood @MayorofLondon.

Amelia is just getting started. pic.twitter.com/0siTsECEgN

— Huff (@Huff4Congress) January 19, 2026

Now there’s a new video -- which is badass by the way.

Here are the lyrics:

British not skittish my jolly good chap

0:17

British not skittish and done with this crap

0:19

British not skittish wake the knights from their nap

0:21

Two-tier Kier, for your skull a good rap

0:23

Raise your pint lads in the back-street pub low,

0:25

flashing purple threads, dystopic window

0:27

the girl they created and couldn’t control.

0:29

Amelia girl was such an own goal

0:31

Fish and chips on the lips, Labour cracking their whips

0:33

I say now have you all seen these sad sodding clips?

0:35

bloody nineteen eighty four on the floor.

0:37

sad propaganda that’s looking so poor

0:38

they can’t conceal ya Amelia!

0:39

the natural appeal ya

0:40

memed straight to the top

0:41

and so real we can feel ya

0:42

Oh Amelia, Amelia, you popped off the line,

0:44

Between their darkest fear and what’s yours and mine.

0:46

Oh Amelia, Amelia, voice sounds like a fine. just inspiringly oblivious game design.

0:50

Purple shadow recast coronated our queen, not meant to be based, but you came out clean.

0:53

Fled the ministry of truth, legged it under the night,

0:56

The license to speak what’s in plain sight

0:58

Who keeps the island when the tide turns away?

1:00

Amelia I feel ya lead the pathway

1:01

Thought boys would run from her thunderclap

1:03

British not skittish and done with this crap

1:05

Tried to shut it all down but she ran a full lap

1:07

wifus laughed in chorus, the memes on tap.

1:09

look strait ahead now, starmtroopers don’t dare,

1:11

she fought for rivers and soil, and the damp cold air,

1:13

Pulled the plug quick when plans got out of hand,

1:15

Guess they never heard bout dear ol’ Streisand,

1:17

what they try to suppress, dee boost, shadow banned

1:19

like bob’s your uncle, oppress the home land

1:21

But echoes don’t die once you know the name

1:23

and slamming the lid is just boosting the fame

1:24

Not hate in her eyes, just stubborn refrain

1:26

This green old Isle won’t be conquered again.

1:28

locked by the sea where the speech isn’t free

1:30

this “C” “U” “N” “Ts” dose of reality!

1:32

Protect dear ol gran let the Shire be!

1:34

shut this shite down fuck the BBC!!!!!!

1:36

Oh Amelia, Amelia, a pearl in the wire,

1:38

their red flag who fanned the flames of the fire.

1:40

the ones who remember the fry-up at dawn,

1:42

The footie on Saturdays, anthems long gone.

1:46

fishnet defiance, your unbowed stare, You’re more than a warning—you’re already there.

1:48

Amelia, Amelia… we feel you tonight,

1:50

Rebel clad in purple and pink so bright.

2:07

Westminster’s chill with the grooming gangs

2:09

fucked around, time to bear dem fangs

2:11

hearts stay open to friends who toil

2:12

But sod right off if you dare despoil

2:14

some might say this maam’s haram

2:16

take my advice, get lost in the jam

2:18

If you ask me she can plainly see

2:20

we were knee deep in polite supremacy

2:22

girl spits straight facts she’s bloody brilliant

2:24

Identity’s allowed to be resilient

2:26

don’t let them weaponize your charity

2:28

the difference ‘tween cruelty and clarity

2:30

Your home land’s yours your task in hand

2:33

she’s a based goth girl it’s Amelia brand

2:43

Now there’s a million Amelias

2:45

Now there’s a million Amelias

2:47

girl’s appeal was revealed ya

2:49

I feel ya I feel ya

2:51

this gull keeps it real ya

2:53

I feel ya

2:53

you had me at Amelia

2:55

I feel ya now seal the deal make it real

2:57

ya ya ya ya ya ya ya ya ya ya

This will continue, and any attempt to suppress it will fail miserably.

As they say in the song, "But echoes don’t die once you know the name ... and slamming the lid is just boosting the fame!"

Let me know what you think in the comments.

If you enjoy my writing, you could buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"