We've been told since the beginning to "follow the science" as it refers to the COVID response. But have any of the "officials" followed the science?

Fauci was interviewed in March of last year where he warned of, "warned of 'unintended consequences' of masks, saying 'people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.' 'There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask.'"

Then he changed his tune and claimed that wearing a mask was essential. Then he upped that to wearing two masks, because two is better than one. However, none of that goes with "the science." There are too many studies to list here that claim that wearing a mask is NOT beneficial.

When it came to the vaccines, the initial push was to "stop the spread."

Appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation," Fauci explained to host John Dickerson that fully vaccinated people can go without masks even if they have an asymptomatic case of COVID-19 because the level of virus is much lower in their nasopharynx, the top part of their throat that lies behind the nose, than it is in someone who is unvaccinated.

"So even though there are breakthrough infections with vaccinated people, almost always the people are asymptomatic and the level of virus is so low it makes it extremely unlikely — not impossible but very, very low likelihood — that they're going to transmit it," Fauci said.

Fauci added that vaccinated people essentially become "dead ends" for the virus to spread within their communities.

But that quickly turned around once the number of vaccinated individuals started becoming infected.

"They are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn't just the elderly," Fauci said. "It's waning to the point that you're seeing more and more people getting breakthrough infections, and more and more of those people who are getting breakthrough infections are winding up in the hospital."

As a result of these findings, Fauci warned that vaccinated people should get their booster shot, as it might actually be more important than health officials first realized. "If one looks back at this, one can say, do you know, it isn't as if a booster is a bonus, but a booster might actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have," he said on The Daily.

Fauci went on to say, "I think … that the boosting is gonna be an absolutely essential component of our response, not a bonus, not a luxury, but an absolute essential part of the program."

Then the CDC was called out about their claims as well.

The Centers for Disease Control are walking back claims made by its director that people who are vaccinated against COVID-19 do not spread the virus, clarifying that they do not yet definitively know if that's the case.

CDC Director Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky had said Tuesday that "vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and that is not just in the clinical trials but it's also in real world data." Her statement was based on a large study the federal health agency released Monday that had tracked newly vaccinated people in the U.S. over 13 weeks to monitor the efficacy of the vaccines in daily life. The CDC followed nearly 4,000 heath care workers, police, firefighters and other essential workers who received one of the two mRNA vaccines between Dec. 14 and March 13 and tested them weekly for COVID-19.

Because the majority of the vaccinated people did not test positive for COVID-19 during the 13 weeks, Walensky concluded that they did not carry the virus.

But after scientists criticized Walensky's comments this week, the CDC walked back her statement.

"Dr. Walensky spoke broadly during this interview," an agency spokesman told The New York Times on Thursday. "It's possible that some people who are fully vaccinated could get COVID-19. The evidence isn't clear whether they can spread the virus to others. We are continuing to evaluate the evidence."

Then the CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky came out and admitted that the vaccines are not stopping infections, or the spread.

Fully vaccinated people who get a Covid-19 breakthrough infection can transmit the virus, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said Thursday.

"Our vaccines are working exceptionally well," Walensky told CNN's Wolf Blitzer. "They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death -- they prevent it. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission."

That's why the CDC changed its guidance last week and is now recommending even vaccinated people wear masks indoors again, Walensky said.

Here's the link from the CDC website.

Today, some of those data were published in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), demonstrating that Delta infection resulted in similarly high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus. This finding is concerning and was a pivotal discovery leading to CDC’s updated mask recommendation. The masking recommendation was updated to ensure the vaccinated public would not unknowingly transmit virus to others, including their unvaccinated or immunocompromised loved ones.

We can see that science is not the basis for the decisions they are making. There's a constant "walking back" of claims because as more data becomes available, it disproves what was claimed prior. Why are we to believe that any of the safety data are correct, when the efficacy data were totally flawed.

After all, they believed that the vaccine was 90% effective, and that those who were vaccinated couldn't spread the disease. The claim can be made that things changed as time went on and more data were gathered, and that's fair enough, but little data is available on the side effects?

For all of the information that they didn't know about protection and transmission --they also couldn't have known about long-term the side effects! Not enough time has passed to claim that the vaccines are safe, yet they are out there claiming it on a daily basis. WHERE'S THE SCIENCE?

Telling people that everything's just fine --until it's not, isn't science it is called propaganda.
 
 
 

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

I decided to write a letter to the the NIH to see what information they could provide me about isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Note: I wrote this to sound like someone who believes the COVID-19 narrative.

I sent out the following email:

From: bob dobalina someone@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 11:33 AM
To: FOIA-7 FOIA71@mail.nih.gov
Subject: I wish to prove that SARS-Cov-2 exists

To Whom It May Concern,

I have a relative that doesn't believe that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated. They are convinced that it's really just the Flu.

I'm worried because they refuse to get vaccinated, and everyone needs to be vaccinated. Having something that proves the existence of the isolated virus would make them think twice.

Is this something that you can help me with?

- Concerned Citizen

Bob

Here was the response.

From: NIAID Ocpostoffice (NIH/NIAID) ocpostoffice@niaid.nih.gov
To: someone@yahoo.com someone@yahoo.com
Cc: NIAID Ocpostoffice (NIH/NIAID) ocpostoffice@niaid.nih.gov
Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021, 04:02:42 PM EDT
Subject: RE: I wish to prove that SARS-Cov-2 exists CAS-28832

This is in response to your email dated August 5, 2021, to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Thank you for your inquiry. You may wish to review the World Health Organization (WHO) Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) SITUATION REPORT - 1 regarding the isolation of SARS CoV-2 at https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4. WHO is the directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations’ system. Further questions regarding this report may be directed to WHO at https://www.who.int/about/contact-us.

Additional information on the isolation of the virus and its genetic sequence is available in the published medical literature which you may search on PubMed at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. PubMed is a service of the NIH National Library of Medicine that includes bibliographic citations from biomedical literature, life sciences journals, and online books. A medical librarian may be able to assist you in refining your search or obtaining copies of journal articles. Please visit https://nnlm.gov to identify your nearest medical library.

In addition, you may wish to review the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) information on growing the virus in cell culture at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html.

Information on how to talk about COVID-19 vaccines with friends and family is also available from CDC at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/talk-about-vaccines.html. CDC is the federal agency that plays a vital role in ensuring our Nation’s vaccine safety, collecting data related to COVID-19 vaccines and providing health information to the public. Further questions may be directed to CDC at the contact information listed below:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30329
USA
Telephone: 1-800-232-4636
Web-based email: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/DCS/ContactUs/Form
Web address: https://www.cdc.gov

Thank you for contacting NIAID.

Sincerely,

Kara M. Harris, MPH

Section Chief for Controlled Correspondence and Public Inquiries
Legislative Affairs and Correspondence Management Branch
Office of Communications and Government Relations
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
National Institutes of Health

DISCLAIMER: NIAID does not endorse or recommend any commercial products, processes, or services. The views and opinions of authors expressed on the NIAID website do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. government and may not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Any non-government resources are provided for your convenience. NIAID is not responsible for the availability, content, or privacy policies of non-federal organizations’ materials or websites, nor does NIAID endorse, warrant, or guarantee the products, services, or information described or offered by such organizations. Non-federal public websites do not necessarily operate under the same laws, regulations, and policies as federal websites. It is not the intention of NIAID to provide specific medical advice, but rather to provide users with information to better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. Specific medical advice will not be provided, and NIAID urges you to consult with a qualified physician for diagnosis and for answers to your personal questions.

I found this part odd, "WHO is the directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations’ system." I would have imagined that the CDC would be the coordinating authority for the United States. Apparently not.

I also found it odd that the push is for mRNA vaccines, instead of conjugate vaccines. If the virus has indeed been isolated, and cultured, why not just make a traditional "conjugate" vaccine?

Cuba is working on their own conjugate vaccine, and with great success!

Cuba’s vaccine candidate has cleared the third stage of the trial; Soberana is the world’s first vaccine candidate for Covid-19, a conjugate vaccine. Cuba is presently at the finalization of two vaccines, Soberana, the conjugate vaccine, and another vaccine, Abdala. The efficacy of both is more than 90%, which is very impressive, not reach by even Pfizer or Moderna in the first dose.

Considering the amount of money thrown around by Big Pharma in the United States, why is Cuba leading the world in the production of conjugate vaccines? It's known that the vaccines based solely on the spike protein mRNA, and Viral Vector, are the first to become useless at the first minor mutation of the virus.

The entire vaccine push in The United States has been bizarre from the beginning. It's widely known that coronaviruses mutate frequently. Why push for vaccines that are at best minimally effective once a mutation occurs? Wouldn't it make more sense to do what Cuba is doing?

You tell me.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

Trump might have set himself up as the vaccine Colt Seavers. Consider this scenario:

Trump has still not come out against the vaccines. This is a big mistake on his part, because I think his political opponents have planned on his ego working against him.

Trump pushed Operation Warp Speed, and touted the "major success" of the program. He paraded it around for quite some time. This is going to be his downfall I believe.

Bill Gates has now come out and said that the vaccines essentially aren't working.

Bill Gates from the Twitter video referenced:

...economic damage, uhh... oh... you know, the deaths, it's been completely horrific. And, I would expect that will lead the R&D budgets to be focused on things we didn’t have today, we didn’t have vaccines that blocked transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health but they only slightly reduce the transmissions. We need a new… a new way of doing the vaccines.

Why would Gates do that, when he's Mr. Vaccine? "A new way of doing the vaccines" doesn't sound like the current ones are doing much, if anything.

The answer is simple. Gates will claim that if they had more time to perfect the vaccines, they would have worked better. When this happens, the media will start releasing all of the vaccine injury data --that they are currently hiding. None of the vaccine injury data has been reported in the mainstream media. The mainstream media are not allowed to talk about vaccine injuries, just like they are not allowed to talk about election fraud, or George Soros. Ask Newt Gingrich. Mention it on Twitter and see how quickly you are banned.

Might the media pin the vaccine injuries on Trump, and Operation Warp Speed? The media and "experts" will claim that because the vaccines were rushed, all of the newly reported injuries are a result. Why else would Twitter and YouTube not ban the video of Bill Gates admitting to the failures of the vaccines?

Also, consider Fauci. He was in with Trump from the beginning, also pushing for vaccines. Fauci has been proven to be a liar. Rand Paul has made this public record. The Disney Fauci movie was a flop and received horrible ratings. Fauci is not well received. Fauci is expendable, they might just throw him in there too, try and tie him to Trump. It wouldn't be hard for the media to pull that off.

Update: 03/10/24

Trump bragged about the vaccines during the 2024 State of The Union Show.

This is not good for anyone who was looking for Trump to “fix” things, but consider this.

In some sense Trump is now the first truly "post-political" symbol in modern America.

Does anyone believe that it was not on purpose?

The way that those on the left have targeted Trump is so over-the-top, that this was always going to be the outcome. They went FULL banana republic on Trump.

Then consider; Twitter/X is still censoring, but they are going to “allow” Tucker to interview Trump — unencumbered, then Putin! Why?

None of this makes any sense. Unless the Deep State/Permanent Government, by playing both sides of the board — will get what they want no matter who is elected.

That’s not to say that Trump is compromised, but it’s not say that he isn’t either.

At this point things appear all over the place, but what if that is the point?

Could it be that Trump is being installed this time?

What do you think?

Buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

This is a very important exchange. Fauci doesn't answer in quite the way I imagined he would.

Fauci says one thing that worries me. Remember during these exchanges Fauci is under oath. He states the following:

Dr. Anthony Fauci:

I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic, OK.

Why is he so specific about "the current pandemic?" That's a strange way to answer. He didn't say "I have no responsibility for ANY pandemic." Isn't that what you would expect someone to say? Does that mean that he was responsible for another pandemic, or perhaps an upcoming pandemic? I know I'm speculating, but what are we to do when someone answers this way?

Another thing to consider, is Fauci referring to the Delta Variant as "the current pandemic?" Could he be responsible for the original SARS-Cov-2 outbreak? Again, I don't know, but I do know that he's very selective in his wording. There's only one reason you would answer that way under oath. You would answer that way if you want to avoid a perjury charge.

!!! UPDATE !!!

Project Veritas has military documents that prove that Fauci lied under oath during a senate hearing.

* Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.

• The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
• “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
• Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried.

What do you think?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

When it comes to explaining what's going on world-wide, this is probably the best video I've seen so far. Tim Gielen does an excellent job of explaining the connections that allow these strange things to happen happen --all over the world.

Please show this to as many people as you can. It is critical that people understand what is coming, if things keep going the way that they are. MONOPOLY - Who Owns The World, is a very eye opening video.

Couple the Tim Gielen video with this article. This article references this EU document authored IN 2018 --BEFORE THE PANDEMIC. They were working on the idea of vaccine passports BEFORE THE PANDEMIC! For what possible reason?

EUROPEAN
COMMISSION
Brussels, 26 April 2018
COM(2018) 245/2

PILLAR I – Tackling vaccine hesitancy and improving vaccination coverage

Key challenges

Vaccine hesitancy and its impact on immunisation programmes are a growing concern in Europe and worldwide. In Europe, safety-related concerns are a key determinant of hesitancy14 for both members of the public and healthcare professionals15. This is despite the fact that vaccines in the EU undergo rigorous testing both pre- and post- licensure, in line with Directive 2001/83/EC16 and Regulation
(EU) No.726/200417. The decrease in certain diseases incidence together with action undertaken by anti-vaccination activists, have led to a shift of focus from the dangers, and even risk of death, posed by unseen diseases towards fear of unproven side events. In addition, the rapid spread of disinformation, understood as verifiably false or misleading information, through online media make sifting science facts from unfounded claims a real challenge for those seeking trustworthy information on vaccines.

Vaccine hesitancy is highly specific to the context, country, and type of vaccine, and the public perception of a given vaccine can change rapidly. This means that there is no one-size-fit-all solution, and a sustainable investment in improving dialogue with citizens, understanding their concerns, and developing tailored intervention strategies is required.

Healthcare workers are especially important, as they remain, rightly, the most trusted source of information for patients. They are best placed to understand hesitant patients, respond to worries, and explain the benefits of vaccination. However, healthcare workers themselves can be vaccine-hesitant, whether considering vaccination for themselves or their patients. Continuous training of all healthcare workers during their studies and once in professional practice is a priority in order to build a confident healthcare workforce that can advise the public on vaccination needs and deliver immunisation effectively.

...

Develop a common EU citizens vaccination card retrievable through electronic information systems and recognised for use across borders, in view of standardising the reporting on immunisation history;

Now you know why they are going to allow minimal exemptions for healthcare workers. The reasoning for this is simple. They don't want healthcare workers who aren't vaccinated --telling people why they aren't vaccinated. This is the single reason why they are allowing large numbers of healthcare workers leave the industry, or be fired, in an industry that is always short staffed. And, during a pandemic of epic proportions, if we are to believe health officials. Another thing to consider, they are not allowing exemptions for people who have been tested for antibodies and have natural immunity. Why? If this is truly about public safety, why not allow antibody testing for those who work in the healthcare industry? They claim that they are short staffed in this industry already, why reduce staff in the middle of a pandemic? The answer, again, they don't want unvaccinated people telling patients why they are not vaccinated!

Why is everything about vaccines now? Health officials are no longer talking about deaths, they are even talking less about cases, because the number of people who have been vaccinated and testing positive, is becoming an issue. Everything is structured specifically to increase the number of people who submit to vaccination. Public health has never been the goal, mass vaccination has been the goal. Why? Since when have the world's governments actually come together for the good of the people? I don't ask that question sarcastically, I'm asking it with all seriousness.

Christine Anderson is brilliant! If this doesn't wake people up, then I don't know what will. You had Fauci spouting off about the possibility of an upcoming pandemic during Trump's time in office. Here you have the EU talking about the need for a vaccine card database in 2018.

In my previous post you saw the United States Deputy Secretary of the Treasury stating, "...We face an economy that's in transition. And as far as that transition we are seeing high prices for some of the things that people have to buy. But, the reality is that the only way we're going to get to this place where we work through this transition is when everyone in America, and everyone around the world gets vaccinated. That's why the president continues to be focused on the idea that we get everyone we can vaccinated in this country."

What do you think?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"