This has to be the most telling thing that Fauci's ever said. Fauci just said the quiet part out loud. This YouTube video probably won't be up for long. Share this video before it's gone so people understand that this is no longer about a virus.

So we have a lot of tasks. We’ve got to do mitigation, put aside all of these issues of concern about liberties and personal liberties, and realize we have a common enemy, and that common enemy is the virus.

This is precisely what they are looking for. Forget about liberties, and do whatever we say. This of course negates the fact that SARS-CoV-2 is no more deadly than the Flu.

We were never asked to give up our liberties for the Flu, so why now? People need to pay more attention to what the "officials" are actually saying.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

This is one of the best factual cases made against mask mandates, and forced vaccination.

Please send this to as many people as you can. You don't have to link to my site. Just link to Rumble, I don't care, but people need to see this!

If you are looking for links to the documents he mentioned in the video; the documents can be found here.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

There have been many articles written about what might happen if hospitals are over capacity, and how they might deal with a "surge" of infected individuals, but now the wait is over. The CDC has already thought through all of the details for us. Let's see what their approach is.

Let's go over some of the basics. Neighbors swap households to accommodate high-risk individuals.

I don't see how that's going to go down nicely anywhere. But, the government has "emergency powers" right now. No problem right?

In short, the CDC recommends, taking over neighborhoods, swapping people between homes, and turning your neighborhood into a FEMA quarantine camp. But, all of this is based on "high-risk" individuals. In other words, all of this hinges on what the definition of "high-risk" is. Right now they claim that the majority of the general population is low-risk, but for how long? This is a critical question.

Then to top it all off you see this in the summary:

The shielding approach is an ambitious undertaking, which may prove effective in preventing COVID-19 infection among high-risk populations if well managed. While the premise is based on mitigation strategies used in the United Kingdom, there is no empirical evidence whether this approach will increase, decrease or have no effect on morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in various humanitarian settings. This document highlights a) risks and challenges of implementing this approach, b) need for additional resources in areas with limited or reduced capacity, c) indefinite timeline, and d) possible short-term and long-term adverse consequences.

There is a well thought out plan in place to deal with a "crisis," but nobody has any evidence that it might work? Not even empirical evidence. That's because it hasn't worked anywhere. You can't quarantine your way out of a respiratory virus. We already know this.

As those who have not been vaccinated are being locked out of shops and restaurants, in some states realize; How long is it before they claim that the unvaccinated are "high-risk?" Remember there doesn't need to be any data to back up the claims. The government is in an emergency state, they can just make it up as they go along. This entire "Shielding Approach" scenario is based on nonsense. There is no data to show that it will help at all. And they are admitting it. But you can rest assured, if they mandate these sorts of things, they won't need any proof or evidence, because it's an "emergency."

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

I've never watched the Stew Peters Show but I did see this clip the other day, and it's definitely worth watching! This man has single handedly caused a reversal in COVID mandates for Alberta Canada all over a $1200 fine!

Health Minister Tyler Shandro is defending the province’s plan to do away with most of its public health measures aimed at curbing the spread of COVID-19, as case numbers climb in Alberta.

“This is a plan that is based on the science and based on the data,” Shandro said during an unrelated news conference in Edmonton Thursday morning.

“We know that people will continue to have that anxiety but this was work that was done by public health based on the science, based on the data.”

Effective Thursday, close contacts will no longer be notified of exposure by contact tracers nor will they be legally required to isolate – although it still recommended.

Further measures will be eliminated Aug. 16. People who test positive for COVID-19 will not be mandated to isolate at that time but it is still strongly recommended. Isolation hotels will also close as quarantine supports end.

Also Aug. 16, provincial mandatory masking orders will be lifted. Some masking in acute care or continuing care facilities may still be required.

Effective Aug. 31, COVID-19 testing will no longer be available through assessment centres. It will be available in primary care settings including doctors’ offices or in acute care and hospital settings.

While the province could not point to another jurisdiction that is taking a similar approach, Shandro maintained this is the next step as the province moves from a pandemic to an endemic response, adding that Alberta is leading the way.

This is amazing, truth actually won! I just don't know if we're too late here in the US.

Now this sets the stage for challenges all over the world. All of those businesses that were fined in California and New York, they need to take this approach. Have health officials, in court, "make the case" for their actions based on science. We know they can't do that.

Which gets to another point. If they still haven't isolated the virus, how are they coming up with all these variants? Another simple question, if the first strain of SARS-CoV-2 can infect vaccinated patients, how can they claim that the new variants are any more or less infectious than the original strain --based on vaccinated patients becoming infected? How would you know the difference?

And lastly, the virus not being isolated would explain why they are pushing an mRNA vaccine, and not a traditional vaccine. They are generating mRNA vaccines from part of what they claim is the SARS-Cov-2 virus. You can't create the traditional vaccines without first isolating the virus. It has to be cultivated and weakened to create a vaccine.

How are labs supposed to calibrate their equipment to scan for the virus, when they have no comparable source by which to gauge calibration? How are you supposed to gauge the immune response without viral isolation? This all seems a little too convenient. And yet, they say "follow the science." If you do "follow the science" you'll find that this is all a little too sketchy, and far too convenient to extend lockdowns and force vaccinations. This is the best invisible enemy ever. Nobody can see it, nobody can even prove it's there. It allows the best possible vector for limiting people's freedoms, while simultaneously pitting one group against another. The "vaccinated vs the "unvaccinated."

I'll leave you with this last little nugget of truth from WhatsHerFace.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

There is a new variant in town. And the messaging behind it is anyone's guess depending on the day. Many people would consider this to be incompetence, but I have a different view of things.

In this news article there is a discussion about reporting surrounding the Delta Variant and the media's handling of the issue. The odd thing is that they are not talking about saving lives, or discussing ways to mitigate outbreaks. Instead, they are discussing how to "handle" the public's perception of what's going on.

The White House is frustrated with what it views as alarmist, and in some instances flat-out misleading, news coverage about the Delta variant. That's according to two senior Biden administration officials I spoke with Friday, both of whom requested anonymity to candidly offer their opinion on coverage of the CDC data released that suggests vaccinated Americans who become infected with the Delta coronavirus variant can infect others as easily as those who are unvaccinated.

The White House is worried about the way things are being reported. Meaning that they don't want people knowing what the CDC data reveals.

Here's Fauci on Face The Nation telling everyone that vaccinated people can spread the virus as easily as unvaccinated people.

I find it interesting that the CDC tries to tackle this issue from the standpoint of, "The vaccine is effective, more than it is not effective." That's pretty much their current selling point. It's not that it will save you, or anyone, but it might make things slightly better, and might make the spread slightly slower. The other thing to notice is that everything is referenced from the number of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals. Those who have contracted and recovered from the virus are never mentioned. Why might that be?

"The media's coverage doesn't match the moment," one of the Biden officials told me. "It has been hyperbolic and frankly irresponsible in a way that hardens vaccine hesitancy. The biggest problem we have is unvaccinated people getting and spreading the virus."

There are two things going on here. First the use of the phrasing "doesn't match the moment" are they following a script? Who talks like this? Second, there is no way to know what percentage of the unvaccinated are spreading anything. They have themselves admitted that people who have been vaccinated can also spread the disease. In other words, how many of the unvaccinated have already contracted and recovered from the virus? They aren't testing people for antibodies, why not? Why don't they prove what they are claiming, it can be done?

The worry about this line of messaging from major media sources worried officials so much, I'm told, that they reached out to several major news organizations with the aim of getting them to dial back the coverage...

This is very troubling. The Biden administration reached out to news organizations and told them to, "dial back the coverage?" This is a very important distinction. They aren't claiming that what was reported is false, but that it might drive people away from getting vaccinated, so it should not be reported. It sounds like the Biden administration needs to control the flow of information in order to get people vaccinated. I thought we were in a Pandemic, where people were dying by the truck load and vaccination was the only way to save us.

The Washington Post ran a headline that read, "CDC study shows three-fourths of people infected in Massachusetts covid-19 outbreak were vaccinated." As Matthew Gertz commented, "Please don't do this. Provincetown has one of the highest vaccination rates in the country. As vaccination rates increase the percentage of cases that are in vaccinated people NECESSARILY increases." The Post's headline was later updated to note that in the outbreak "few required hospitalization."

The whole point of the vaccine was to reduce the spread. At least that's what they were claiming in the beginning. Now the Biden administration is putting out a directive admitting that those areas with the highest vaccination rates are also seeing a higher number of infections, but the hospitalizations are lower. Now the vaccines have been knocked all the way down to "reduce hospitalizations."

News orgs aren't the only ones to blame

I also called up Dr. Leana Wen, a CNN medical analyst and former Baltimore health commissioner, who agreed that the media is "missing the big picture, but so is the CDC." Wen explained that the CDC said it was changing its mask guidance because of the new data regarding rare instances in which a vaccinated person becomes infected and can then spread the virus. "They got it wrong," she said. "The reason why the guidance is changing is that Covid-19 is spreading really quickly, Delta is a big problem, and the reason for the spread is because of the unvaccinated." Wen said the primary reason the CDC needed to change its mask guidance is because the honor system wasn't working. In other words, people who were not vaccinated were acting as if they were and not wearing masks or following other basic safety protocols...

Let's check out Dr. Leana Wen's Bio on Wikipedia.

Isn't it convenient that they fail to mention what Dr. Leana Wen is most known for? Dr. Leana Wen was the head of Planned Parenthood. I think it goes without saying, that someone who fights for the rights of people to euthanize their own children, is not exactly the best spokesperson for saving everyone through vaccination.

The moral of the story is; once you lie to a point, there's no way to walk back the lies. As Dan Cummins (the comedian) would say, "They’ll endlessly invent new lies, to cover up the previous lies, because reality is not an issue in their heads."

The Biden administration is loosing control of the narrative. Their endless stream of lies is catching up with them. They don't have an information problem. They have a problem telling the truth. If they were truthful from the beginning, they wouldn't be in the situation they're in now.

People are hesitant to take the vaccines because even if they don't have all the data, they still can sense when someone is lying to them.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"