This story is astonishing considering all that is going on right now.

According to a CDC spokesperson, the monkeys were en route to a CDC-approved quarantine facility after landing Friday morning in New York. They are originally from Mauritius, a country in eastern Africa.

The crash happened around 3:30 p.m. Friday afternoon, that’s when the three monkeys got free in the Danville area.

Police say the driver who was transporting the monkeys was charged in the crash.

Originally, state police told us four monkeys were on the loose.

As of Saturday afternoon, some people were still worried.

“Little monkeys, we got bears, we have coyotes, we have deer, you know all the time. A little 3-pound monkey doesn’t scare me, but why are they so concerned about it is what concerns me,” said Howie Lerch, Valley Township.

Friday night Newswatch 16 spoke with Michelle Fallon of Danville, who saw the entire accident. She jumped into action; helping both drivers and the loads they were carrying.

“I walk up back on the hill and this guy tells me, ‘Oh, he’s hauling cats. I said, ‘oh.’ So I go over to look in the crate and there’s this green cloth over it. So I peel it back, I stick my finger in there and go ‘kitty, kitty.’ It pops its head up and it’s a monkey,” Fallon said.

Fallon was contacted Saturday by the CDC and was told to monitor herself for any cold-like symptoms.

A public health risk assessment was conducted by several organizations, including the CDC. They confirm the escaped monkeys were humanely euthanized.

It gets even more strange when you see the truck. It wasn't a tractor trailer, it's just a pickup truck with a trailer! It looks like it could be from a lawn service.

Isn't it a little odd to be transporting research monkeys, on their way to a quarantine facility -- in an unmarked truck driven by a private contractor? This is the CDC we're talking about here, they don't have their own people to move these animals around? If there was any concern as to any illnesses the monkeys might have, wouldn't the trailer need to be marked? In other words, if the CDC is moving around a potential biohazard, don't they have the responsibility to make sure that these animals are transported in the safest way possible?

The CDC isn't looking too good right now. The monkeys were going to a CDC-approved quarantine facility. The CDC approved moving potential biohazards in a standard trailer pulled by an unmarked truck. Their "approval" doesn't meet the highest standards.

A few days later, the woman that was in contact with the monkeys is now showing symptoms.

Danville, PA – Michelle Fallon is living a nightmare. And, she’s ready to put that nightmare on record.

The Danville woman is now experiencing symptoms, believed to be related to her close encounter with wild monkeys, when the trailer they were riding in collided with a dump truck and unloaded their cages all over Route 54, close to I-80, on Friday afternoon. (The monkeys were destined for an unidentified Centers for Disease Control lab, in the Midwest.)

The following day, Fallon developed a cough and something that resembled “pink-eye.” And, by Sunday, she was visiting the Geisinger Medical Center emergency room, where infectious disease doctors were consulted. Fallon has since received her first (of 4) preventative rabies shots; as well as a prescription for a 14-day course of Valacyclovir.

The stay-at-home mom, who shared that she was fully vaccinated and received her booster, was also tested for Covid, but the results at the ER were negative.

Then there's the issue with the driver.

The driver of the truck hauling the monkeys, identified in a press release from PA State Police, as Cody M. Brooks, 31, of Keystone Heights, FL even went so far as to put his hand in the camera of a local Press-Enterprise reporter. “He was very, very upset,” said Fallon. “He was in a panic.” Brooks passenger, Daniel G. Adkins, 59, of Florahome, FL required transport to Geisinger Medical Center for an injury.

Michelle Fallon is experiencing symptoms, and they have put her on antiviral drugs, they obviously think that she might have caught something.

There's no telling what's really going on here, but whatever it is, it has exposed a serious problem. The CDC is not competent enough to be performing these types of transports. That being the case, are they competent to be performing the experiments either?

The CDC is supposed to be the Gold Standard when it comes to to infectious diseases. The CDC is funded by the most wealthy country on the planet, and this is how they conduct business?

What do you think?

Buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

To start with, there are at least three major countries across the pond that have decided to remove mask mandates, and drop vaccines passports altogether.

The UK was the first to start the trend with Boris Johnson ending the Plan B restrictions.

In the U.K., the government said Wednesday, it would lift the coronavirus restrictions it imposed last month to deal with Omicron in England.

As of Thursday, the government said it would no longer recommend people work from home. Face masks will no longer be mandated in shops and classrooms. From Jan. 26, people will no longer have to provide proof of vaccination or a negative Covid-19 test to enter nightclubs and other large venues in England. The government said it should soon lift the legal requirement to self-isolate after a positive Covid-19 test. Scotland will also drop most restrictions from Monday.

Reported U.K. cases have fallen 33% in the latest week from the week before, while hospitalizations have fallen nationwide by 7% week-on-week and Covid-19 intensive-care cases haven’t come close to levels earlier in the pandemic. Deaths within 28 days of a positive Covid-19 test continued to climb, however.

Case rates have fallen, but the number of deaths within 28 days of a positive test continued to climb? That doesn't sound right, if the vaccines were working, this would not be possible. It's also worth noting that the lifting of mandates is somehow not front page news on the BBC website.

Ireland also decided to drop their COVID restrictions.

The Tanaiste Leo Varadkar said on his way to the Coalition leaders meeting that if there is ‘no longer a public health rationale for any particular restriction, there is no political rationale for it’.

‘The other thing I’d say is a particular thanks to the Irish people. It’s been a very long two years. Certainly not over yet, but we’re in a much better place than we were previously. That is really down to a world-beating vaccine program.

Really? The same vaccine program that is not reducing the death rate in the UK?

Finally, there's France. France has also decided to drop their COVID restrictions.

Europe is moving fast to exit the emergency coronavirus measures that have disrupted all aspects of life for the past two years, a recognition that the measures have been largely futile against the omicron variant.

Ireland is set to announce it’s dropping most pandemic restrictions on Friday, days after England outlined its own dramatic move to scrap rules forcing people to wear face masks in shops and ending mandatory isolation for positive cases.

France is also relaxing curbs even after reporting a record number of cases -- almost 470,000 -- in one day earlier this week.

The various announcements mark a growing sign that the road back to normal, or something resembling it, is well under way in Europe. But they also reflect the fact that omicron appears practically unstoppable, with the EU reporting more than 2.3 million cases on Thursday alone.

With omicron symptoms milder than the earlier delta variant and hospitalization rates in check, governments are struggling to justify imposing curbs on people and businesses. Some have already started talking about treating Covid-19 as endemic, a as they move toward “living with the virus” policies.

The obvious question would be why now? They were all touting more lockdowns just weeks ago. France has reported record case numbers, why ease restrictions now? Why all around the same time? I believe there are two major factors here.

The WHO has redefined herd immunity to include people with prior infections. It was changed at the start of the pandemic to only include people who were vaccinated.

Here's the WHO website in November of last year.

‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.

Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it. Read the Director-General’s 12 October media briefing speech for more detail.

Vaccines train our immune systems to develop antibodies, just as might happen when we are exposed to a disease but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question. Visit our webpage on COVID-19 and vaccines for more detail.

Here's the WHO website today. Notice they added the part about previous infection.

'Herd immunity', also known as 'population immunity', is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. WHO supports achieving 'herd immunity' through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread through any segment of the population, as this would result in unnecessary cases and deaths.

Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the disease. Read the Director-General’s 12 October media briefing speech for more detail.

The second part is the court order from a federal judge in Texas.

Jan 7 - Score one for transparency.

A federal judge in Texas on Thursday ordered the Food and Drug Administration to make public the data it relied on to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, imposing a dramatically accelerated schedule that should result in the release of all information within about eight months.

That’s roughly 75 years and four months faster than the FDA said it could take to complete a Freedom of Information Act request by a group of doctors and scientists seeking an estimated 450,000 pages of material about the vaccine.

Still, the FDA is likely to be hard-pressed to process 55,000 pages a month.

At that rate, the 10 employees would have to work non-stop 24 hours a day, seven days a week to produce the 55,000 pages a month (and would still fall a bit short).

But as lawyers for the plaintiffs Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency pointed out in court papers, the FDA as of 2020 had 18,062 employees. Surely some can be dispatched to pitch in at the FOIA office.

Keep in mind that the FDA only approved Comirnaty for use outside of the U.S. not the EUA version of Pfizer's vaccine.

Now that the documents from the FDA can be released in a reasonable amount of time. Lawyers all over the world, and in Europe are going to see what the real trial data reveals.

There are two sides to this as well. We know from the Pfizer government contracts, that Pfizer doesn't have to cover any legal costs as it relates to vaccine related injuries, the government which agreed to the contract does.

When people start suing governments all over Europe, how will that turn out? I think they are backing off on this because they know that lawsuits are coming at an alarming level. The only way to thwart that is to put some time between when the FDA documents become public, and when vaccines were last administered.

This would also explain dropping the vaccine passports. Because they are documents that prove when someone received the vaccine. Governments don't want people having vaccination records, because that can prove the date in relation to adverse reactions.

I don't think that the protests had anything to do with the decisions being made. I think it was all driven by the threat of lawsuits --lawsuits which could actually bankrupt governments.

I'm sure MANY more European nations will begin dropping their mandates since the time of this writing.

What do you think?

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it, I'm looking for conversation... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

The court struck down the OSHA mandate, but upheld the mandate for employers that accept Medicare or Medicaid cash.

There is a good side to this and a bad side.

The good side is that large amounts of people will be able to keep their jobs without having to forgo vaccination.

The bad side is that the court basically said that congress abdicated their authority on the issue, as it relates to employees at health care facilities that participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The government basically OWNS those employees at that point.

The Supreme Court voted 5-4 to lift lower court stays that had halted enforcement of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) emergency regulation, finding the government’s challenge to it would probably be successful. The rule, now in effect, requires more than 10 million employees at health care facilities that participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

In this case, all three liberal justices–Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor—sided with the government in the court’s opinion in Biden v. Missouri. Two conservatives, Roberts and Kavanaugh, also sided with the government.

The majority opinion states: “Congress did grant authority to the health secretary to promulgate” regulations he considers necessary to protect health and safety. Although a vaccination mandate is unprecedented, “we agree with the government that the Secretary’s rule falls within the authorities that Congress has conferred upon him,” they added.

Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion that was joined by Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett.

The case is “only about whether [HHS] has the statutory authority to force health care workers, by coercing their employers, to undergo a medical procedure they do not want and cannot undo. Because the Government has not made a strong showing that Congress gave [HHS] that broad authority, I would deny the stays pending appeal,” the dissent states.

This is Obamacare coming back to haunt everyone. I covered this years ago, long before Obamacare was passed.

The word Commissioner [Think HHS Secretary] is referenced in the bill 203 times. Nearly every time the word Commissioner is used, there is a variable to be determined, or a definition to be defined by the Commissioner. The Commissioner has broad sweeping power to shape nearly the entire health care industry. This is crucial to understanding how this legislation works. There are only a few exclusions by which State Law can override the decisions of the Commissioner. Also the Commissioner, "shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate." The democrats have unchecked power with control of both the House and the Senate. There will be no way to stop the appointee for the position of Health Choices Commissioner. I guess we had better hope they pick someone who doesn't want to destroy the current system.

This is what happens when congress gives unchecked power to some czar-type official.

This will ultimately be how they get their "Voter Rights Act" originally (H.R. 1 / S. 1) enacted.

If they can’t get (H.R. 1 / S. 1) passed outright, they will create a new czar to oversee elections, that czar will have the authority (granted by congress) to make it happen. This is how it’s done in Washington. Obamacare was the same way. They created a position called the “Health Choices Commissioner” (in the original ACA bill) later renamed. They didn’t pass Obamacare in one swoop. They created the framework by which they could mandate all the necessary parts of Obamacare through intermediaries --effectively side-stepping congress..

I think that we've been under the rule of a single party system for much longer than many people are willing to admit.

Only time will tell if we can pull out of this as a nation.

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it, I'm looking for conversation... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

We have been told all along that COVID is killing record numbers of people. But there's one problem with that. The fatality rate is not that high. So What is killing so many people?

Dr. Robert Malone sources an insurance company to show how none of these numbers add up.

“The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people.

“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference this week. “The data is consistent across every player in that business.”

OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company that has had its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877. The company has approximately 2,400 employees and sells life insurance, including group life insurance to employers in the state.

Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers,” and that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.

“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said.

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.””

To simplify, you have an illness with at the lowest a 99.5% survivability rate, roughly that of the Flu (for the age group in question). If you remember, the Flu took off for entire year of 2021. That being the case, how can you have an illness with such a high survivability rate, result in a 40% increase in deaths for people ages 18 to 64? Even if you factor in that they banned many early treatments and therapeutics, you still couldn't get to that number.

The short answer is -- you can't explain a 40% increase in deaths from a virus on par with the Flu. You definitely can't explain the majority of those deaths occurring outside the age range where people are most likely to die from COVID-19.

The answer as to why so many people died can be found in the public health response to the illness.

Let's look at one thing that pretty much all "working age" people have in common -- besides being minimally effected by COVID-19. There was/is a vaccine mandate, and if you don't comply, you will most likely be fired.

There were many contributing factors. Lockdowns, people having their movement restricted, substance abuse, suicides, a complete lack of outpatient treatment options.

However, vaccines have to be the largest contributor to these deaths, because vaccines are the only thing in common amongst this group of people with an abnormally high death rate -- while simultaneously having the least risk of death from the virus.

Something to keep in mind, the CDC is not considering someone vaccinated until 14 days after the shot is administered. That means that anyone who died from an allergic reaction would not be counted in vaccine injury numbers, as most allergic reactions take place within hours. Similarly the majority of people with myocarditis and other inflammatory, or cardiovascular issues also would have reactions within a short period of time after the shot was administered -- much less than 14 days.

The CDC purposely pushed out the time required to consider someone "vaccinated" to avoid capturing data proving that the vaccines are harmful.

The only thing you hear from public health officials is, "The best protection against COVID-19 is vaccination. And the vaccines are safe and effective." But you never hear anything about outpatient treatments, why is that?

What do you think?

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it, I'm looking for conversation... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

There was a food shortage war game that took place on November 2014 in Washington DC. There have always been these kinds of events that assume a huge tragedy will happen, but lately I'm a little more worried when I see these kinds of things.

Remember the SPARS Pandemic Scenario? After reading through that document, you could just about forecast what was going to happen next with the COVID-19 Pandemic to date -- even down to the high level people within the FDA and NIH resigning. And it speaks to the vaccine injuries as well.

Lately the LAM (Legacy American Media) have been changing their tune as it relates to COVID-19. Now there is the Omicron variant, which is more mild. People are starting to find out that the vaccine related injuries are MUCH higher than were being reported. Australia is starting up a system to pay people compensation for vaccine related injuries.

Consider the numbers. 79,000 who were injured by the vaccines in Australia, that doesn’t account for those who died.

Now look at the population of Australia, somewhere around 25 million. Even if you said that only 50% were vaccinated, that’s 12.5 million. Let's adapt those numbers to work for the U.S. with a population of 350 million people? Let’s say half of the U.S. population were vaccinated, that’s 175 million.

Simply using a linear ratio, you’re looking at 1,106,000 people severely injured by COVID vaccines in the U.S.

How many people have they claimed COVID has killed in the U.S.? 814,638 is what USA Facts lists (at the time of writing).

It’s reasonable to assume that many more people were injured by vaccines, than were injured or died from COVID. And this is no small amount either, we’re talking about a difference of 291,362. Also keep in mind that that number 814,638 includes all of the people who died "WITH COVID, not FROM COVID. The actual number of people who died from COVID should be closer to 200,000 somewhere in line with the Flu, because COVID has about the same survivability rate as the Flu. In other words, COVID can't have the same survivability rate as the Flu, but kill (5) times more people.

Even Fauci is admitting that the COVID hospitalization numbers, as it relates to children, are completely misleading. He is echoing the exact same thing that many of us have been saying since the beginning. There were a lot of people that died WITH COVID, not FROM COVID.

The question is, why are they winding all of this down right now? Right at the start of 2022. None of this information is new. We have gone from 14 days of self isolation all the way down to 5. But nothing has changed, this means that the 14 day period was entirely unnecessary. And all of the most locked down countries are having the most new cases. The lockdowns were never necessary either.

Combine this information with the fact that the vaccine injuries were kept secret by the media but are now becoming increasingly harder to hide. I don't think they can keep this up much longer. The whole COVID Crisis narrative is starting to fall apart, so what's the next big thing to push the world closer to a global totalitarian state?

Climate Change!

Let's take a peek at the Food Chain Reaction Crisis Simulation Kicks off in Washington DC.

This morning, at the outset of the game, players were shown the video you can see for yourself on this page. The simulated newscast describes the world as it is projected in 2020, the starting point of the game. In the scenario, food prices are rising sharply, putting millions of people on the brink of hunger and poverty. Climate change’s impact are deepening, making monsoons in Asia less reliable and affecting traditional bread baskets such as the U.S., Canada and Brazil.

“We do this so we can learn,” said Stone. “The things we’ll see here, we could easily see in the real world. It makes sense to game things out and practice, so we can be better prepared when we encounter scenarios like these down the road.”

The game was designed by the Washington-based Center for Naval Analyses, which also designs war games for the Pentagon. Food Chain Reaction was built with the same degree of realism the U.S. military requires.

“People tend to sensationalize these things,” said Cargill economist Tim Bodin, who assisted in the game design. “We didn’t want to do that. Rather, we used realistic assumptions, based on the impacts we expect climate change to have over the next 10 to 15 years and how we’ve seen markets actually react to disruption in the recent past, like the 2008-09 food crisis.”

This in and of itself doesn't seem like a smoking gun, but combine the climate change narrative with what the United States Deputy Secretary of the Treasury said.

"...We face an economy that's in transition. And as far as that transition we are seeing high prices for some of the things that people have to buy. But, the reality is that the only way we're going to get to this place where we work through this transition is when everyone in America, and everyone around the world gets vaccinated. That's why the president continues to be focused on the idea that we get everyone we can vaccinated in this country."

How does everyone in the world being vaccinated coincide with a "shortage of truckers?" Once everyone on the planet is vaccinated, are the truckers going to come back? At which point will they know that everyone in the world that can be vaccinated -- is vaccinated. That's a ridiculous notion.

What this really means is that the supply chain issues have nothing to do with "trucker shortages" or any of the other excuses they are giving, they are manmade and designed to cause economic distress. This is made evident by the fact that there were no supply chain shortages, other than toilet paper, for the entire first wave of COVID-19. There were no food shortages like there are now, and the price of meat wasn't inflated.

This whole supply chain fiasco is 100% manufactured. They are trying to put the squeeze on the remaining people who won't get vaccinated. Not only is food about to become much more expensive, this will be happening at the same time that many people will be loosing their jobs because of the vaccine mandate. It all lines up just right.

Now we have the Climate Change Crisis, which will be the next big excuse to keep meddling with the economy. The Food Chain Reaction Crisis Simulation begins in the year 2020. That's when the price of food is supposed to start rising drastically because of Climate Change. But we know Climate Change is not why this is happening.

Pay close attention to where the LAM (Legacy America Media) directs the narrative. I guarantee that they will start backing off of COVID and vaccines, and start preaching Climate Change, and begin trying to make Climate Change the reason for all of the world's ills.

What do you think?

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it, I'm looking for conversation... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"