Trump might have set himself up as the vaccine Colt Seavers. Consider this scenario:

Trump has still not come out against the vaccines. This is a big mistake on his part, because I think his political opponents have planned on his ego working against him.

Trump pushed Operation Warp Speed, and touted the "major success" of the program. He paraded it around for quite some time. This is going to be his downfall I believe.

Bill Gates has now come out and said that the vaccines essentially aren't working.

Bill Gates from the Twitter video referenced:

...economic damage, uhh... oh... you know, the deaths, it's been completely horrific. And, I would expect that will lead the R&D budgets to be focused on things we didn’t have today, we didn’t have vaccines that blocked transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health but they only slightly reduce the transmissions. We need a new… a new way of doing the vaccines.

Why would Gates do that, when he's Mr. Vaccine? "A new way of doing the vaccines" doesn't sound like the current ones are doing much, if anything.

The answer is simple. Gates will claim that if they had more time to perfect the vaccines, they would have worked better. When this happens, the media will start releasing all of the vaccine injury data --that they are currently hiding. None of the vaccine injury data has been reported in the mainstream media. The mainstream media are not allowed to talk about vaccine injuries, just like they are not allowed to talk about election fraud, or George Soros. Ask Newt Gingrich. Mention it on Twitter and see how quickly you are banned.

Might the media pin the vaccine injuries on Trump, and Operation Warp Speed? The media and "experts" will claim that because the vaccines were rushed, all of the newly reported injuries are a result. Why else would Twitter and YouTube not ban the video of Bill Gates admitting to the failures of the vaccines?

Also, consider Fauci. He was in with Trump from the beginning, also pushing for vaccines. Fauci has been proven to be a liar. Rand Paul has made this public record. The Disney Fauci movie was a flop and received horrible ratings. Fauci is not well received. Fauci is expendable, they might just throw him in there too, try and tie him to Trump. It wouldn't be hard for the media to pull that off.

Update: 03/10/24

Trump bragged about the vaccines during the 2024 State of The Union Show.

This is not good for anyone who was looking for Trump to “fix” things, but consider this.

In some sense Trump is now the first truly "post-political" symbol in modern America.

Does anyone believe that it was not on purpose?

The way that those on the left have targeted Trump is so over-the-top, that this was always going to be the outcome. They went FULL banana republic on Trump.

Then consider; Twitter/X is still censoring, but they are going to “allow” Tucker to interview Trump — unencumbered, then Putin! Why?

None of this makes any sense. Unless the Deep State/Permanent Government, by playing both sides of the board — will get what they want no matter who is elected.

That’s not to say that Trump is compromised, but it’s not say that he isn’t either.

At this point things appear all over the place, but what if that is the point?

Could it be that Trump is being installed this time?

What do you think?

Buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

This is a very important exchange. Fauci doesn't answer in quite the way I imagined he would.

Fauci says one thing that worries me. Remember during these exchanges Fauci is under oath. He states the following:

Dr. Anthony Fauci:

I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic, OK.

Why is he so specific about "the current pandemic?" That's a strange way to answer. He didn't say "I have no responsibility for ANY pandemic." Isn't that what you would expect someone to say? Does that mean that he was responsible for another pandemic, or perhaps an upcoming pandemic? I know I'm speculating, but what are we to do when someone answers this way?

Another thing to consider, is Fauci referring to the Delta Variant as "the current pandemic?" Could he be responsible for the original SARS-Cov-2 outbreak? Again, I don't know, but I do know that he's very selective in his wording. There's only one reason you would answer that way under oath. You would answer that way if you want to avoid a perjury charge.

!!! UPDATE !!!

Project Veritas has military documents that prove that Fauci lied under oath during a senate hearing.

* Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.

• The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
• “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
• Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried.

What do you think?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

When it comes to explaining what's going on world-wide, this is probably the best video I've seen so far. Tim Gielen does an excellent job of explaining the connections that allow these strange things to happen happen --all over the world.

Please show this to as many people as you can. It is critical that people understand what is coming, if things keep going the way that they are. MONOPOLY - Who Owns The World, is a very eye opening video.

Couple the Tim Gielen video with this article. This article references this EU document authored IN 2018 --BEFORE THE PANDEMIC. They were working on the idea of vaccine passports BEFORE THE PANDEMIC! For what possible reason?

EUROPEAN
COMMISSION
Brussels, 26 April 2018
COM(2018) 245/2

PILLAR I – Tackling vaccine hesitancy and improving vaccination coverage

Key challenges

Vaccine hesitancy and its impact on immunisation programmes are a growing concern in Europe and worldwide. In Europe, safety-related concerns are a key determinant of hesitancy14 for both members of the public and healthcare professionals15. This is despite the fact that vaccines in the EU undergo rigorous testing both pre- and post- licensure, in line with Directive 2001/83/EC16 and Regulation
(EU) No.726/200417. The decrease in certain diseases incidence together with action undertaken by anti-vaccination activists, have led to a shift of focus from the dangers, and even risk of death, posed by unseen diseases towards fear of unproven side events. In addition, the rapid spread of disinformation, understood as verifiably false or misleading information, through online media make sifting science facts from unfounded claims a real challenge for those seeking trustworthy information on vaccines.

Vaccine hesitancy is highly specific to the context, country, and type of vaccine, and the public perception of a given vaccine can change rapidly. This means that there is no one-size-fit-all solution, and a sustainable investment in improving dialogue with citizens, understanding their concerns, and developing tailored intervention strategies is required.

Healthcare workers are especially important, as they remain, rightly, the most trusted source of information for patients. They are best placed to understand hesitant patients, respond to worries, and explain the benefits of vaccination. However, healthcare workers themselves can be vaccine-hesitant, whether considering vaccination for themselves or their patients. Continuous training of all healthcare workers during their studies and once in professional practice is a priority in order to build a confident healthcare workforce that can advise the public on vaccination needs and deliver immunisation effectively.

...

Develop a common EU citizens vaccination card retrievable through electronic information systems and recognised for use across borders, in view of standardising the reporting on immunisation history;

Now you know why they are going to allow minimal exemptions for healthcare workers. The reasoning for this is simple. They don't want healthcare workers who aren't vaccinated --telling people why they aren't vaccinated. This is the single reason why they are allowing large numbers of healthcare workers leave the industry, or be fired, in an industry that is always short staffed. And, during a pandemic of epic proportions, if we are to believe health officials. Another thing to consider, they are not allowing exemptions for people who have been tested for antibodies and have natural immunity. Why? If this is truly about public safety, why not allow antibody testing for those who work in the healthcare industry? They claim that they are short staffed in this industry already, why reduce staff in the middle of a pandemic? The answer, again, they don't want unvaccinated people telling patients why they are not vaccinated!

Why is everything about vaccines now? Health officials are no longer talking about deaths, they are even talking less about cases, because the number of people who have been vaccinated and testing positive, is becoming an issue. Everything is structured specifically to increase the number of people who submit to vaccination. Public health has never been the goal, mass vaccination has been the goal. Why? Since when have the world's governments actually come together for the good of the people? I don't ask that question sarcastically, I'm asking it with all seriousness.

Christine Anderson is brilliant! If this doesn't wake people up, then I don't know what will. You had Fauci spouting off about the possibility of an upcoming pandemic during Trump's time in office. Here you have the EU talking about the need for a vaccine card database in 2018.

In my previous post you saw the United States Deputy Secretary of the Treasury stating, "...We face an economy that's in transition. And as far as that transition we are seeing high prices for some of the things that people have to buy. But, the reality is that the only way we're going to get to this place where we work through this transition is when everyone in America, and everyone around the world gets vaccinated. That's why the president continues to be focused on the idea that we get everyone we can vaccinated in this country."

What do you think?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

Click the image above to watch the video video on Twitter. Right after claiming that there is a shortage of truckers, the United States Deputy Secretary of the Treasury says:

"...We face an economy that's in transition. And as far as that transition we are seeing high prices for some of the things that people have to buy. But, the reality is that the only way we're going to get to this place where we work through this transition is when everyone in America, and everyone around the world gets vaccinated. That's why the president continues to be focused on the idea that we get everyone we can vaccinated in this country."

How does everyone in the world being vaccinated coincide with a shortage of truckers? Once everyone on the planet is vaccinated, are the truckers going to come back? At which point will they know that everyone in the world that can be vaccinated is vaccinated. That's a ridiculous notion. What this really means is that the supply chain issues have nothing to do with "trucker shortages" or any of the other excuses they are giving.

This is evident by the fact that we had no shortages, other than toilet paper, for the most part during the first wave of COVID. There were no food shortages like there are now, and the price of meat wasn't inflated.

I'm afraid that he just let the cat out of the bag. This whole supply chain fiasco is 100% manufactured. They are trying to put the squeeze on the remaining people who won't get vaccinated. Not only is food about to become much more expensive, this will be happening at the same time that many people will be loosing their jobs because of the vaccine mandate. It all lines up just right.

The question everyone needs to ask themselves is, "Why didn't this happen --before there was a vaccine?"

What do you think?

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

UPDATE 10-22-21: What I was worried about, now seems to be the case.

URGENT: Covid vaccines will keep you from acquiring full immunity EVEN IF YOU ARE INFECTED AND RECOVER

What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.

This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).

It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.

Aside from that, everything is fine.

Here's the info from the Red Cross website, detailing that they've known this all along.

I have screen captured this entire web page because I know it's subject to change, or be removed as it points out one very important detail.

Q: What is the different between COVID-19 antibodies that you develop from exposure to the virus and antibodies you develop as a reaction to the vaccine?

A: Antibodies that an individual produces when they’ve been exposed to the virus are slightly different from the antibodies that an individual produces when they’ve been vaccinated. When an individual has been infected with a virus, they produce antibodies to multiple regions of a virus. At the Red Cross, we use two antibody tests to generate our results on blood, platelet and plasma donations. One test – Ortho’s total test – detects antibodies to the spike protein of the virus. The other detects antibodies to a different protein of the virus called the nucleocapsid protein. If a donor has had the COVID-19 vaccine, they will generate an antibody against the spike protein but not the nucleocapsid protein, which will only occur in the event of a COVID-19 infection.

Initial reports were that the vaccines would "wipe-out" the antibodies trained to the nucleocapsid protein, and leave only the spike protein antibodies. They are not denying this claim. They instead use the phrase "not accurate." There's a huge difference in "not accurate" and not true. This is written in legal verbiage. The only reason to write a non-denial, denial is because there is truth to claim. Those who have been vaccinated no longer produce the antibodies for the nucleocapsid protein, only the spike protein.

Q: I’ve heard claims that the Red Cross refuses to accept convalescent plasma from individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine because it wipes out the antibodies. Is this true?

A: There are claims circulating that incorrectly state that the Red Cross will not accept convalescent plasma donations from those who have received the COVID-19 vaccine because “the vaccine wipes out those antibodies making the convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other COVID-19 patients.” This is not accurate.

The FDA allows people who have received a COVID-19 vaccine to donate dedicated COVID-19 convalescent plasma within six months of their infection of the virus, based on data that antibodies from natural infection can decline after six months.

They are really parsing words here. So in the statement above they say, "The FDA allows people who have received a COVID-19 vaccine to donate dedicated COVID-19 convalescent plasma within six months of their infection of the virus, based on data that antibodies from natural infection can decline after six months." Then we have the Red Cross requirements below.

Q: Are individuals who received a COVID-19 vaccine eligible to give COVID-19 convalescent plasma?

A: The FDA revised its convalescent plasma donor eligibility guidance on February 11 specifically to ensure that convalescent plasma donors have sufficient levels of antibodies as a result of their illness or immune response to a COVID-19 infection versus just the vaccine. The FDA allows people who have received a COVID-19 vaccine to donate dedicated COVID-19 convalescent plasma within six months of their infection of the virus.

One of the Red Cross requirements for plasma from routine blood and platelet donations that test positive for high-levels of antibodies to be used as convalescent plasma is that it must be from a donor that has not received a COVID-19 vaccine. This is to ensure that antibodies collected from donors have sufficient antibodies directly related to their immune response to a COVID-19 infection and not just the vaccine, as antibodies from an infection and antibodies from a vaccine are not the same.

The Red Cross has their own requirements. The Red Cross requirements, "One of the Red Cross requirements for plasma from routine blood and platelet donations that test positive for high-levels of antibodies to be used as convalescent plasma is that it must be from a donor that has not received a COVID-19 vaccine."

The Red Cross is following the guidance of the FDA. If you were not infected 6 months before vaccination they won't accept convalescent plasma donations.

The COVID-19 vaccines change your immune response. This is undeniable. All vaccines change your immune response. But I'm unaware of any other vaccine that will stop your body from producing one particular type of antibody over another. The COVID-19 vaccines are not enhancing your immune system, like a traditional vaccine. The COVID-19 vaccine is modifying your immune system to produce a particular antibody, and no longer produce the antibodies from a natural immune response.

This could create a large deficit in your immune response when it comes to SARS-CoV-2, and possibly other viral infections as well. Has this been studied? What is the effect on those who have been vaccinated, and are exposed to the Flu? There are a lot of unanswered questions here. but I do know when I'm being lied to, and this is a legally approved lie. It's trying to have it both ways. Wiping out the antibodies is not the same as no longer producing them. But that's a literary difference, not a real world difference. If you are left with the inability to produce the nucleocapsid protein antibodies, they will necessarily die out. Nobody knows the long term effects of this condition, or if it effects nucleocapsid protein antibody production for other infections.

Now there's this! Click the picture to view the study info.

Conclusions This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant.

Here is a link to Red Cross website and below is a screenshot of the whole webpage, because I'm sure they will change it to remove references to this data. After all, as they say in the document multiple times, "the Red Cross stopped collecting convalescent plasma completely on June 14." That translates to, stop asking questions!

Here's a screen capture of the webpage. Click the image to enlarge it.

What do you think?

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it, I'm looking for conversation... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"