Nobody Trusts A.I., but It's The Humans We Should All Be Worried About...

This is not a “bubble,” this is 100% on purpose (and predictable). A.I. (henceforth referred to as 'AI') is the “hot” investment for everyone right now – governments included – but it’s a trap.

The idea is to get enough money into a central vehicle (in this case AI in general) – that will fail, then people (and governments) will be in the same boat. You can only bail yourself out to a certain extent, then faith in the entire global system collapses.

So, to save the “global economy,” we’ll need a global (or at least globally connected/maintained) digital banking system that can track these kinds of trends (which humans/live people are already tracking) and stop these events from occurring.

We don’t need more regulations, or some digital currency(s) – to enforce the laws that are already in place – because the regulators in charge right now are failing to enforce those laws, only most people don't know/understand that.

A problem is created, a solution is "needed"

For example, take a look at what the World Bank is saying.

World Bank Releases Its First Report on the Circular Economy in the EU, Says Decoupling Growth From Resource Use in Europe Achievable Within Decade

BRUSSELS, December 6, 2022—Globally, extraction of raw materials stands at over 100 billion tons, annually. This staggering figure is driven by both the persistently high levels of material consumption in high-income countries and the rapidly growing needs in emerging economies.

The World Bank’s first comprehensive report on the circular economy in the European Union (EU)—“Squaring the Circle: Policies from Europe’s Circular Economy Transition”—states that the current “take-make-use-waste” linear model of economic expansion is increasingly unsustainable, not only on environmental terms, but also from an economic security and inclusion dimension. The report concludes, however, that comprehensive policy packages can reduce material consumption while still maintaining growth and welfare creation.

Countries in the EU are global leaders in promoting the Circular Economy transition, after making it a centerpiece of its growth strategy and embarking on a vast regulatory reform program. The World Bank report examines the EU's experience in furthering the circular economy agenda to elicit lessons that can benefit countries within and beyond Europe’s borders. The report also concludes that ambitious circular economy policies could reduce Europe’s aggregate material use by up to 11 percent and effectively decouple growth from the use of raw material resources within a decade.

Over the past two decades, total material use in the EU has decreased by 9.4 percent and the share of resources derived from recycled waste increased by almost 50 percent. However, while impressive, progress in transitioning to a circular economy appears more limited when viewed in relation to Europe’s actual material footprint.

“Our dominant ‘take-make-use-waste’ global economic model is unsustainable. Current global demand for natural resources exceeds our planet's regenerative capacity by a factor of 1.75; we simply do not have another planet.” said Gallina A. Vincelette. World Bank Country Director for the EU. “Europe is at the leading edge of the circular economy transition, but circular business models need to move from the niche to the mainstream. The good news is that the right policies, aimed at creating incentives on the pricing of natural resources, providing information for better decision making by economic actors, enabling institutions to mainstream circularity as a whole-of-government agenda, and unlocking investment - can enable significant progress.”

Europe’s private sector is the engine of the circular economy, however innovative circular economy business models remain limited in scale, depth, and speed of adoption. Average market penetration of these models stands at just five to 10 percent; recycled materials currently represent only 8.6 percent of raw material input, and the share of remanufacturing products compared to new manufacturing is just 1.9 percent. Without rapid scale-up, the sustainability potential of a circular economy will not be realized.

“While also paying the environmental costs of our current linear model, developing countries – particularly those whose economies are heavily concentrated on raw materials exports - also face trade related risks from circular economy policies enacted in high income countries,” said Sameh Wahba, Regional Sustainable Development Director for Europe and Central Asia. “Developing countries need to be central to the global transition towards a more circular economy.”

Finally, the report highlights that in Europe, the economic costs to be incurred from the decoupling between economic growth and material use could be offset by appropriate fiscal policies aimed at shifting the tax burden from labor to raw material extraction, use and waste.

From the very start, this "transition" is needed because it's a global "existential" problem.

"Stop questioning our motives, if we fail (to come to power) the entire planet will die."

This is often the rationale used to impose global dominance schemes. It's always about resource control. What happens when the government controls the means of "raw material extraction?" That's literally what they are going for here. Forget the means of production. This is the means – of the means of production. They're cutting out the possibility that someone has manufacturing resources – that might be able to work against their plans.

Taxes will allow full and total control of resource management – because that's the heart of a global technocracy.

When this transition takes place, who will know when, and where to move their investments, and at which critical juncture? If I had to guess, it would be everyone involved in the scheme from the start.

Too often people get caught up in the narrative, which is, "If we don't do this, we all die."

Of course, that's always been nonsense, and it always will be.

The "tell" is the use of the term "global." It's never US food insecurity, or European food insecurity. No, It's always global food insecurity.

"Why?," you might ask. Because "global" problems require "global" solutions... right...? Oh, and don't forget the fact that the technocrats require more power for each and every solution.

Back to circular trading

All of the circular trading taking place in the AI space is being done to usher in government backed digital currencies — because the only way to stop this "global economic problem" — is to turn over power to the same people who created the problem in the first place.

We’re in the middle of a directed market collapse, and AI investment is the vehicle to bring it about.

What do you think?

If you enjoy my writing, you could buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"