| Nobody Trusts A.I., but It's The Humans We Should All Be Worried About... » |
The Jan 6th Narrative Keeps Getting More Absurd as Time Goes On
I'm not usually one who jumps into these sorts of things. But as time goes on, everything about Jan 6th just keeps getting more and more ridiculous.
Yesterday Oct. 22, 2025 the FBI Washington Field Office put out a Tweet that said;
"The FBI is still offering a $500,000 reward for information that helps identify the person who placed pipe bombs at the offices of the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee on January 5, 2021. As part of our ongoing investigation, we're releasing an updated video of the subject, which includes previously unreleased footage, higher quality video, and longer clips of the subject's movements."
https://x.com/FBIWFO/status/1981126112534057061
Can We Trust What We See?
Why are the pictures grainy and cheesy like a Bigfoot picture?!
Really, this is the FBI?
Many of us already know, because of the grainy photos, that the timers which were supposed to have been attached to bombs at the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee on January 5, 2021 — are not realistic.
You can't use a 60-minute kitchen timer (egg timer) to set off an explosive — the next day. There would be no reason to set off an explosion the day before Jan 6 — because the entire event would have been canceled.
Think about that for a minute.
Also, neither explosive device ever detonated.
Here's a picture from the full-screen video:
Somehow, CNN has a much clearer picture than the FBI, and it's from 2021.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2021/01/29/exp-tsr-todd-dc-pipe-bombs-were-placed-the-night-before.cnn
If someone were trying to do anything, from any political standpoint, this makes no sense.
However, there is a scenario where it does make sense.
Media Influence and AI Manipulation
Tricking people is easy, but tricking the systems that trick people is even easier.
Consider, if AI is going to return data on Jan 6th, where is the data going to come from? It's going to come from the most repeated source(s).
If you can direct most of those sources with nonsense — people will see nonsense when they search the events of that day.
The idea is to get Trump's name associated with Jan 6th and "Bombs" as frequently as possible, such that most people will see the two together (subconsciously linking the two events together). Truth is not an issue, just that the two events were linked (however illogically). Never mind that the entire bomb plot is illogical, and could serve no legitimate purpose — and that's the giveaway.
The bomb plot serves no legitimate interest, it's an implausible and silly proposition — however, if repeated enough, people will remember it — and they'll remember Trump's name along with it.
Fast forward to today, and what do we see? The same unreasonable story being pushed again. Why?
Because the "No Kings" Protests were a flop, and didn't achieve any marked results.
And so, the next thing is to push and older narrative again, so people will believe that it has more merit than it does — because they've heard about it more than once.
That's literally what's going on here.
What do you think?
If you enjoy my writing, you could buy me a Ko-Fi 😉👉
Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"


