I downloaded this copy of the condensed version of "The Road to Serfdom" years ago, and it was free. I can't seem to find it anywhere free right now, but if it was free then it should be free now, am I right!?

If you've never read the entire book "The Road to Serfdom" that's OK. This condensed version is about the best you'll find.

Pay close attention at the end. You'll find something very strange. You'll see a pamphlet "The Road to Serfdom In Cartoons."

Who paid for it will really blow your mind! It says, "Reproduced from a booklet published by General Motors, Detroit, in the ‘Thought Starter’ series (no. 118)"

Please share this with as many people as you can! This needs to be out there again. With people trying to rewrite history, or schools simply not teaching history at all, this kind of literature is needed now more than ever!

This is a link to WindUpRubberFinger.com

WindUpRubberFinger direct link to, The Reader’s Digest condensed version of "The Road to Serfdom."

This is a Microsoft OneDrive link. You can use this link for other websites, or posts.

Microsoft OneDrive link to, The Reader’s Digest condensed version of "The Road to Serfdom."

https://1drv.ms/b/s!AkQkP7_1dDDikEho-tZ7HW0EzLuH?e=sH1lr1

Use this QR code to link to this post, for easy sharing. Please help me to spread this file to as many people as possible. It's critical that people understand what's going on. Thank you in advance.

Please leave a comment, like it or hate it... You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment. Email addresses are NOT used. Just make one up "someone@somehost.com"

When reading this keep in mind this only concerns Georgia.

Why would there be an issue with candidates for Senate when the system was already validated? It’s just a list of names.

Why did the validated systems mess up right before the election, requiring a software patch to correct the issue, requiring Dominion techs to be onsite to perform the patch?

When it comes to these sorts of things I don’t believe in coincidences.

Did Dominion have code specifically designed to cause the name errors AFTER a specific date. This would create the need for Dominion techs to come in and “patch” the machines AFTER they were validated. I'm not sure how the state approved changes to the machines after validation. That's very sketch to me as well.

The paper printed from the machine has a QR code on it. The QR codes are NOT unique. YOU CAN SCAN THE SAME PRINTOUT MULTIPLE TIMES, without verifying the voter ID! The voter ID should follow the printout. Even a 1-dollar bill has a serial number on it!

Now you know why they don't want Republican poll watchers to watch the counting. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) released a statement, "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” The CISA statement came less than a week after election day. Some states weren’t even done counting yet.

Multiple scanning of the same printed ballots can account for the ridiculous 90% turnout in some areas of Wisconsin and Michigan.

This was not overlooked, the machines were designed this way on purpose.

Have you ever wondered how the FDA can track tainted foods all the way down to the farm, and the date they were packaged? They even know when and where they were shipped to.

I have worked in FDA regulated facilities. They require pretty much everything you do be documented. Changing a validated system after the fact is illegal. As well as falsifying data are illegal.

Here's a link to: CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Keep in mind this is only: PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.

If you notice everything is very well thought out. There are controls in place to make sure that nobody can alter records, and if they try, there are methods by which it can be determined they have been tampered with. Why can't we have the same level of controls in place for voting? It's really not that complicated. Put controls in place that "keep people honest." It can be done.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

The following states are locking down again --just in time for the holiday season! When it comes to the Democrats, I don't believe in coincidences.

1. Minnesota
2. Maryland
3. California
4. Iowa
5. Wisconsin
6. Utah
7. Rhode Island
8. Michigan
9. Connecticut
10. Massachusetts
11. Illinois
12. Colorado
13. Idaho
14. Florida
15. New York
16.New Jersey
17. Pennsylvania
18. Texas
19. Kentucky
20. Mississippi
21. Nebraska
22. New Mexico

So the question is why? We know that lockdowns are ineffective, mostly because the virus has been all over the world now since at least September of last year. So the question should be, why lock it down now?

After watching the news here lately it has become apparent that the Democrats want to try and pass another Corona Virus Relief Bill. That's code for Democrat slush fund.

But there's two things in the way. First there's the Republicans, tired of the slush funds, they'll block it if it's total pork. Then there's the fact that the economy is doing much better now. There's less need for a stimulus with things rebounding economically.

Most people are talking about diminishing freedoms, tyrannical rules instated by Democrats, cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas. While these things are all true, the reason behind it is not a power grab in the way you might think.

The reason for the lockdown measures is simple. Democrats need more economic disarray. Once the people in the lockdown states are squeezed economically, the Democrats will use the economic damage as leverage to blame Republicans for the Relief Bill not getting passed.

It's always the same with the Democrats. Create a crisis, then use that as leverage to get your way legislatively. They are killing two birds with one stone, making the Republicans look bad, and testing how much freedom they can grab in one swoop.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I've often said that anything which comes out and says "trust me" is usually not good. It's like "America's Favorite Cookie," or "Quality Tools." If it says, "Quality" on the box, it's safe to assume that there's probably a cheap knock off inside.

This brings me to my next point. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has released a statement about the integrity of the elections and the voting machines used in the election.

WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

"When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

"Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

"While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

There are already a few things wrong here. First, and foremost, how can the CISA claim that this is the most secure election ever, when it's only been a few days since the voting stopped? There hasn't even been an investigation into the allegations of fraud -- some of the states aren't done counting yet. Second, this statement only addresses the ballot scanning machines themselves, not the people operating them. Let's see who some of the people who "administer elections" are.

I'm sure we can trust that Katie Hobbs, Arizona Secretary of State, was in no way going to alter the election results. She believes that Trump's voting base is "Neo-Nazis." Is it hard to believe that she could have a bias towards Nazis? Is it also hard to believe that she might lie and cheat to save the world from Nazis?

Then there's this guy Joe Gloria. He want's to investigate fraud AFTER the election.

Another thing to consider is that these people happen to be in states that have contested elections. Funny how the states with little fraud claims don't have people like this charge?

But hey, to quote the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, "turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

There are people actively trying to steal this election. Like there have been in almost any election anywhere in the world. Knowing that voter/election fraud happens all over the world, why would we assume it didn't happen this time, on either side?

20% of people steal items when going through a self checkout line, but the Mainstream Media claims there's no evidence that any voter fraud occurred. Does anybody really believe that this was the first election anywhere that was fraud free? As Biden would say, "C'mon, man!?"

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!

I have been saying all along that I think that the people in the contested states are going to destroy the ballots so that they can't be recounted. Why not? Hillary destroyed devices and evidence, nothing happened. The Mueller investigative team destroyed devices and evidence, nothing happened. Why couldn't those who counted the votes in Pennsylvania Michigan and Wisconsin just destroy the ballots? Maybe there would be a fire, or another broken pipe. It would leave them undecipherable, then they would claim that the original vote stands.

Meanwhile they are parading Biden around as if he's the president, when the vote hasn't even been certified yet. This will just make it harder to push back when the actual votes are counted, if they are counted. But I believe that's the idea.

Now we have this!

Nevada Clark County Registrar of Voters, Joe Gloria, said his office has received allegations of voter fraud but will not investigate them until “post-election.”

“We do have some reports that have come in that we’re logging for reporting. But we’re definitely going to do an investigation, and we’ll deal with them once the canvass is finished,” Gloria (pictured) said during a Saturday press conference in response to questions involving potential voter fraud. However, the investigation will not start immediately.

“The votes are in the system at this point, so we’ll have to after the election, post-election, go after anything that’s been reported at this time,” he added.

How is this ensuring the integrity of the vote? How does this make anyone feel better about the process?

Let me get this straight. Joe Gloria wants the illegitimate votes to stand in the final total, then go back and see which ones were actually valid? In what world does this make sense?

This IS LITERAL election meddling. Leaving the invalid votes in the final total, knowingly, is perpetuating fraud! This man should be charged and removed from his position.

Note: You DO NOT need to register to leave a comment.

Follow The WindUpRubberFinger on Twitter!