<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/4.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Wind-Up Rubber Finger - Latest Comments on George Stephanopoulos disagrees with Obama's definition of TAX</title>
		<link>http://winduprubberfinger.com/blog1.php?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://winduprubberfinger.com/blog1.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=112" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=4.0.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>OGRE [Member] in response to: George Stephanopoulos disagrees with Obama's definition of TAX</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>OGRE [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c88@http://winduprubberfinger.com/</guid>
			<description>This whole thing is unbelievable! I think the only reason that George Stephanopoulos even posed the question, is because he was a former member of the Clinton administration. I can&#039;t imagine too many people involved with Clinton actually getting along with Obama. But that&#039;s another story.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if the rest of the news media is going to turn on Curious George Stephanopoulos?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only time will tell...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This whole thing is unbelievable! I think the only reason that George Stephanopoulos even posed the question, is because he was a former member of the Clinton administration. I can't imagine too many people involved with Clinton actually getting along with Obama. But that's another story.<br />
<br />
I wonder if the rest of the news media is going to turn on Curious George Stephanopoulos?<br />
<br />
Only time will tell...]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://winduprubberfinger.com/blog1.php/2009/09/21/george-stephanopoulos-disagrees-with-oba#c88</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title> John Galt [Visitor] in response to: George Stephanopoulos disagrees with Obama's definition of TAX</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Galt [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c87@http://winduprubberfinger.com/</guid>
			<description>Next time he makes a comparison to auto insurance, he should lose a nut.  HE is the one who is stretching.  But since we&#039;re shoving health insurance down people&#039;s throats whether they want it or not, what are all the Christian Scientists going to do now?  Wouldn&#039;t this be the same as forcing the Amish to carry auto insurance?  Oops, did I just make a comparison to auto insurance?  There&#039;s goes lefty-loosey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;d like to see more of these guys slapping a few facts down on the table in front of this idiot and see how long he can argue against things like the dictionary which have no room for interpretation.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Next time he makes a comparison to auto insurance, he should lose a nut.  HE is the one who is stretching.  But since we're shoving health insurance down people's throats whether they want it or not, what are all the Christian Scientists going to do now?  Wouldn't this be the same as forcing the Amish to carry auto insurance?  Oops, did I just make a comparison to auto insurance?  There's goes lefty-loosey.<br />
<br />
I'd like to see more of these guys slapping a few facts down on the table in front of this idiot and see how long he can argue against things like the dictionary which have no room for interpretation.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://winduprubberfinger.com/blog1.php/2009/09/21/george-stephanopoulos-disagrees-with-oba#c87</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
